From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006F05937
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  2 Jun 2016 15:37:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jun 2016 06:24:04 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,406,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="993799470"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.54])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 02 Jun 2016 06:24:01 -0700
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:23:57 +0025
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:23:57 +0100
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20160602132356.GA8880@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1464858795-3152-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <20160602123337.GA14836@bricha3-MOBL3> <3747156.fc7lGR2aaH@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3747156.fc7lGR2aaH@xps13>
Organization: Intel Research and =?iso-8859-1?Q?De=ACvel?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?opment?= Ireland Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] scripts: check commits with checkpatch
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 13:37:59 -0000

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:15:54PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-02 13:33, Bruce Richardson:
> > Testing this out here, I find that git format-patch includes the diff stats
> > in the output, which then can trigger long-line warnings for the commit message.
> > 
> > 	WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
> > 	#8:
> > 	 examples/my-new-test-app/basicfwd.c | 342 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 
> > To fix this, I suggest replacing "format-patch --stdout" with "show --format=email"
> > since that should give the same output just without the change stats.
> 
> or format-patch --no-stat
>
Sure, whatever works! :-) It's just a longer command :-)

/Bruce