DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mlx: fix compilation with older Glibc
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:25:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160620092518.GT7621@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57642581.8070704@intel.com>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:29:53PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/14/2016 10:22 AM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> > A missing define in the previous patch causes additional compilation
> > issues.
> > 
> > Fixes: 3025206f5060 ("mlx: fix compilation with recent Glibc")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
> 
> "older Glibc" or "recent Glibc" can be very hard to trace from git
> history later.

I wasn't sure about the exact version, it appears to be 2.19 and/or 2.20,
where _BSD_SOURCE was modified and subsequently removed.

I suggest squashing this patch into the original broken commit ("mlx: fix
compilation with recent Glibc") if possible, I did not submit a v2 as it is
already applied on dpdk-next-net.

> Does it make sense to add glibc version info for the failing ones or
> fixed one?

Depends if we can modify the first commit. If we do, let's squash them
together before adding version information, otherwise let's modify the
second one only.

I can submit a v2 that overrides both commits or only the second one, tell
me what you think is best.

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-20  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-10 15:09 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mlx: fix compilation with recent Glibc Adrien Mazarguil
2016-06-10 15:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mlx: regenerate autoconf file automatically Adrien Mazarguil
2016-06-13 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mlx: fix compilation with recent Glibc Bruce Richardson
2016-06-13 13:08   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-14  9:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mlx: fix compilation with older Glibc Adrien Mazarguil
2016-06-17 16:29   ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-06-20  9:25     ` Adrien Mazarguil [this message]
2016-06-20 10:04       ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-20 13:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mlx: fix compilation with Glibc 2.20 Adrien Mazarguil
2016-06-20 15:24           ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160620092518.GT7621@6wind.com \
    --to=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).