From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EA4C4C0 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jun 2016 04:32:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,516,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="993582662" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.220.161]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2016 04:32:56 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:32:55 +0025 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:32:55 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Nelson Escobar Cc: dev@dpdk.org, johndale@cisco.com Message-ID: <20160623113255.GG5024@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1465948445-12571-1-git-send-email-neescoba@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1465948445-12571-1-git-send-email-neescoba@cisco.com> Organization: Intel Research and =?iso-8859-1?Q?De=ACvel?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?opment?= Ireland Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] enic: improve ptype handling X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:32:59 -0000 On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 04:54:05PM -0700, Nelson Escobar wrote: > - add l4 ptypes to the ones we report as supporting > - report/use RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN and > RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6_EXT_UNKNOWN instead of RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4 and > RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6 as vic can't distinguish between packets with > extentions and those without extentions. > - correctly set the ptype bits set on packets that are both tcp/udp > and a frag > - set RTE_PTYPE_L4_NONFRAG on ip packets we know are not udp, tcp, > or fragments. > > Fixes: 947d860c821f ("enic: improve Rx performance") > > Signed-off-by: Nelson Escobar > Reviewed-by: John Daley Applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_07 /Bruce