Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] virtio: conditional compilation cleanup

[Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:36:48PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 04:46:36PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > @@ -494,9 +486,6 @@ virtio_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  {
> >  	uint8_t vtpci_queue_idx = 2 * queue_idx + VTNET_SQ_TQ_QUEUE_IDX;
> >  
> > -#ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSSE3
> > -	struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private;
> > -#endif
> >  	struct virtnet_tx *txvq;
> >  	struct virtqueue *vq;
> >  	uint16_t tx_free_thresh;
> > @@ -511,13 +500,14 @@ virtio_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  #ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSSE3
> > +	struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private;
> 
> I'd suggest to move above declaration to ...
> 
> >  	/* Use simple rx/tx func if single segment and no offloads */
> >  	if ((tx_conf->txq_flags & VIRTIO_SIMPLE_FLAGS) == VIRTIO_SIMPLE_FLAGS &&
> >  	     !vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
> 
> here: we should try to avoid declaring vars in the middle of a code block.

Next patch in this series, moving all rxtx handler selection code to
separate function(virtio_update_rxtx_handler()) where declaration comes
as first line in the function.i.e the comment is taken care of in the
series.

> 
> 	--yliu