From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F012C06 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:41:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2016 01:41:19 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,574,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="840199229" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2016 01:41:18 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:42:32 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Jerin Jacob Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, jianbo.liu@linaro.org, huawei.xie@intel.com Message-ID: <20160704084232.GY2831@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1467028448-8914-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <1467371814-26754-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <1467371814-26754-2-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <20160704073648.GV2831@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <20160704083626.GA12596@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160704083626.GA12596@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] virtio: conditional compilation cleanup X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 08:41:21 -0000 On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 02:06:27PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:36:48PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 04:46:36PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > @@ -494,9 +486,6 @@ virtio_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, > > > { > > > uint8_t vtpci_queue_idx = 2 * queue_idx + VTNET_SQ_TQ_QUEUE_IDX; > > > > > > -#ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSSE3 > > > - struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private; > > > -#endif > > > struct virtnet_tx *txvq; > > > struct virtqueue *vq; > > > uint16_t tx_free_thresh; > > > @@ -511,13 +500,14 @@ virtio_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, > > > } > > > > > > #ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSSE3 > > > + struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private; > > > > I'd suggest to move above declaration to ... > > > > > /* Use simple rx/tx func if single segment and no offloads */ > > > if ((tx_conf->txq_flags & VIRTIO_SIMPLE_FLAGS) == VIRTIO_SIMPLE_FLAGS && > > > !vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) { > > > > here: we should try to avoid declaring vars in the middle of a code block. > > Next patch in this series, moving all rxtx handler selection code to > separate function(virtio_update_rxtx_handler()) where declaration comes > as first line in the function.i.e the comment is taken care of in the > series. Yes, I saw that. But in principle, each patch is atomic: it's not a good idea/practice to introduce issues in path A and then fix it in path B. --yliu