From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Received: from wes1-so1.wedos.net (wes1-so1.wedos.net [46.28.106.15])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082AF2A66
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  4 Jul 2016 17:00:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz (pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz
 [147.229.13.147])
 by wes1-so1.wedos.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3rjqvL5YtPzBXb;
 Mon,  4 Jul 2016 17:00:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:00:34 +0200
From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, David Marchand
 <david.marchand@6wind.com>, "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>, Santosh
 Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>, "Stephen Hemminger"
 <stephen@networkplumber.org>, Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Message-ID: <20160704170034.29c22b8f@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz>
In-Reply-To: <C6ECDF3AB251BE4894318F4E45123697821306F6@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1461937456-22943-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com>
 <1465822926-23742-2-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com>
 <C6ECDF3AB251BE4894318F4E45123697821306F6@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
Organization: RehiveTech
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/16] vfio: fix include of eal_private.h
	to be local
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 15:00:31 -0000

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:22:08 +0000
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:

[...] 

> There's no patch cover letter so I'll reply to the first patch. I've done some cursory testing with a NIC, nothing seems to be broken and the code looks OK to me. So, once this patchset is rebased on latest master (patches 9, 14 and 15 no longer apply cleanly), ack from me.

I am going to post v3. Should I include the ACKs on all patches or will you post them yourself?

Jan

> 
> Thanks,
> Anatoly