From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C755AA4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  5 Jul 2016 22:08:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [2606:a000:111b:40ed:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] (helo=localhost)
 by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>)
 id 1bKWe6-0000sQ-86; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 16:08:42 -0400
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:08:32 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160705200832.GA9997@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
References: <1466189185-21952-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
 <1880215.Z7Hk19TYxz@xps13>
 <20160704164117.GA8177@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>
 <3642881.NHURDUQBJt@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3642881.NHURDUQBJt@xps13>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spam-Status: No
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/7] export PMD infos
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 20:08:45 -0000

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:10:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-07-04 12:41, Neil Horman:
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:10:14PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi Neil,
> > > 
> > > I don't really understand why you don't accept I contribute to this
> > > patchset. More details below.
> > > 
> > I don't object to your contribution to this patchset.  What I object to is you
> > making changes contrary to what I just spent I don't even know how many weeks
> > arguing with you and others about.  Given your role as maintainer, it is
> > tantamout to a 'my way or the highway' position.
> 
> Thank you for explaining your feeling so clearly.
> I'm sorry for any inconvenience or misunderstanding.
> I now understand that you prefer I make some patches separately after
> integrating your version.
> So I can send a v10 based on your v8 which only fixes compilation.
> Or you can do it yourself if you prefer.
> Then I'll send another series for the other changes.
> Deal?
> 
You go ahead and do it, I'm done.
Neil