From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F9F6CC5 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:43:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cpe-2606-a000-111b-40ed-7aac-c0ff-fec2-933b.dyn6.twc.com ([2606:a000:111b:40ed:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1bLW2u-0005KK-R8; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:42:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:42:14 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , dev@dpdk.org, "Richardson, Bruce" , Stephen Hemminger , Panu Matilainen Message-ID: <20160708134214.GB14917@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <20160708121744.GA14917@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <2459096.U0Mj9JPKfX@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2459096.U0Mj9JPKfX@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto: normalize cryptodev pmd names with macros X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 13:43:57 -0000 On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:40:01PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-07-08 08:17, Neil Horman: > > I suppose thats fine, sure, though I'm really not comfortable with an open > > source project requiring what appears to be non-open source components (though I > > can't really tell what the snow3g or kasumi license is). > > Yes you're right. > IMHO, it is acceptable because it is free (just need a registration) > but it can be discussed. > I think there are some legal export issues because of crypto aim. Yeah, crypto usually has munitions export restrictions. I'm fine with that, as long as the license to the code is GPL. And I can't tell what the license is because you have to register to get it before you can see it. If you, or someone can confirm that the snow3g and kasumi ssl libraries are open source compatible (or better still if the license can be announced prior to registration on the web site), then I'm fine with it, and am happy to test with it, I just don't want to register without knowing that beforehand. > I suggest to avoid discussing this topic here and launch a dedicated thread > (with better visibility). > Sounds good to me Neil >