From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB1D2BA2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  5 Aug 2016 15:00:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cpe-2606-a000-111b-40ed-7aac-c0ff-fec2-933b.dyn6.twc.com
 ([2606:a000:111b:40ed:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost)
 by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>)
 id 1bVejH-00072g-FO; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:00:09 -0400
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:59:52 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Remy Horton <remy.horton@intel.com>
Cc: Yerden Zhumabekov <e_zhumabekov@sts.kz>,
 "Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20160805125952.GA22528@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
References: <1470170269-20721-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com>
 <5511822.hGlaykcsx3@xps13>
 <345C63BAECC1AD42A2EC8C63AFFC3ADC2829180F@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <e4d4d6e8-371a-8f79-325f-8b312b4cd263@sts.kz>
 <ace2ff33-de0d-4b3b-f22b-e3af57cf5fba@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ace2ff33-de0d-4b3b-f22b-e3af57cf5fba@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01)
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spam-Status: No
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/4] Use Google Test as DPDK unit test framework
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:00:19 -0000

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:11:56AM +0100, Remy Horton wrote:
> 
> On 05/08/2016 08:41, Yerden Zhumabekov wrote:
> [..]
> > We use cmocka.org for tests. Written in C. It has support for:
> > * mocking;
> > * setup/teardown;
> > * asserts;
> > * test groups.
> > 
> > Output is nicely formatted.
> 
> Cmocka's mocking relies on Gnu ld's --wrap feature, which has problems if
> the function being mocked is defined in the same compilation unit that it is
> used. Pity really as otherwise it looked quite good to me.
> 
Can't you use ld's --undefined option to get the correct behavior?  I thought
that was specifically what it was there for.

Neil

> ..Remy
>