From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF233989
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:03:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2016 23:03:06 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,564,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1040005419"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2016 23:03:07 -0700
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:12:49 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20160823061249.GG30752@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1471499173-11749-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <56458495-5ee1-ff9c-c2d0-819b120cfcbc@redhat.com>
 <ED26CBA2FAD1BF48A8719AEF02201E36106397F6@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ED26CBA2FAD1BF48A8719AEF02201E36106397F6@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: remove VLAN strip option
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:03:07 -0000

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:19:15AM +0000, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> > > +VLAN strip option is removed, because different NICs have different
> > behaviors
> > > +when disabling VLAN strip. Such feature, which heavily depends on
> > hardware,
> > > +should be removed from this example to deduce confusion. Now, VLAN
> > strip is
> > I'm not a native English speaker, but I would use "reduce" instead of
> > "deduce" here. I might be wrong, so feel free to keep as-is if
> > appropriate.
> 
> Nice catch! Yes, "reduce" instead of "deduce".

Fixed and applied to dpdk-next-virtio.

Thanks.

	--yliu