From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E5F47D0 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6E67BD7; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:08:31 -0700 From: Matthew Hall To: "Bodek, Zbigniew" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20160831180831.GA748@mhcomputing.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] OpenSSL and non-BSD licenses in DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:08:32 -0000 On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:26:41PM +0000, Bodek, Zbigniew wrote: > I've seen some GPL stuff, mostly kernel modules from > Intel. So what with the above mentioned OpenSSL? The modules are that way to be compatible with the kernel. The rest is BSD. See: http://dpdk.org/dev on Licenses. Matthew.