From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77492716 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:50:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2016 07:50:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,268,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="3607785" Received: from ar11-dell-r730-02-jeff.jf.intel.com ([10.166.45.35]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2016 07:50:11 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:47:27 -0700 From: Jeff Shaw To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Jeff Shaw , dev@dpdk.org, helin.zhang@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, damarion@cisco.com Message-ID: <20160901144727.GA92363@ar11-dell-r730-02-jeff.jf.intel.com> References: <1468515542-39207-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com> <1542652.v1vhCPdXLZ@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1542652.v1vhCPdXLZ@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Add ptype and xsum handling in i40e rx vpmd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:50:14 -0000 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:26:23PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-07-14 09:59, Jeff Shaw: > > Our testing suggests minimal (in some cases zero) impact to core-bound > > forwarding throughput as measured by testpmd. Throughput increase is > > observed in l3fwd as now the vpmd can be used with hw_ip_checksum > > enabled and without needing '--parse-ptype'. > > > > The benefits to applications using this functionality is realized when > > Ethernet processing and L3/L4 checksum validation can be skipped. > > > > We hope others can also test performance in their applications while > > conducting a review of this series. > > Thanks for the patches. They need some careful review and are a bit late > for an integration in 16.07. Thus they are pending for 16.11. Hello, I noticed there are other patches going into i40e ahead of this one. Would somebody please review and merge this one if there are no issues? Thanks, Jeff