From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0983E532C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2016 07:01:21 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,322,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="1049115739"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2016 07:01:20 -0700
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 22:01:52 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
Message-ID: <20160912140152.GH23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1471319402-112998-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <1473392368-84903-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <3a40c167-c21e-8cb6-33ae-6043cb13b463@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3a40c167-c21e-8cb6-33ae-6043cb13b463@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] vhost: optimize enqueue
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:01:22 -0000

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:52:12PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Just tried to apply your series without success.
> Apparently, it is not based directly on master branch,
> as it lacks some SHA-1 information.
> 
> Could you rebase it against master please?

It's rebased against the dpdk-next-virtio tree [0], where all the
virtio/vhost patches are applied first.

[0]: http://dpdk.org/browse/next/dpdk-next-virtio/

	--yliu