From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31B85934; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:58:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2016 03:57:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,367,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="1033608018" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2016 03:57:58 -0700 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:58:29 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Dror Birkman Cc: nicolas.pernas.maradei@emutex.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20160920105829.GU23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1474367963-83879-1-git-send-email-dror.birkman@lightcyber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1474367963-83879-1-git-send-email-dror.birkman@lightcyber.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pcap: fix memory leak in jumbo frames X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:58:01 -0000 On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:39:23PM +0300, Dror Birkman wrote: > If rte_pktmbuf_alloc() fails on any segment that is not the initial > segment, previously allocated mbufs are not freed. You should put a "fixline" here. Besides that, I think it's a good candidate for stable branch. Thus, stable@dpdk.org cc'ed. --yliu