From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB482C4B for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7AE7ACE; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:55:43 -0700 From: Matthew Hall To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "dev@dpdk.org" , Nikita Kozlov Message-ID: <20160922175543.GA19530@mhcomputing.net> References: <20160919212257.GA27713@mhcomputing.net> <3263960.cPWMKkvuZx@xps13> <20160921172905.GA7158@mhcomputing.net> <20160921164205.000645d8@xeon-e3> <20160922015034.GA10277@mhcomputing.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] LPM6 next hop size X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:55:44 -0000 On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:07:46PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > If you have 2G of huge memory and one 16M routes then the rules start to > kill an application. > Since huge memory is unpageable (pinned) then it is limited. Won't paging out routes result in very poor network performance?