From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2412B8C for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:18:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2016 01:18:04 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,339,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="772086625" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2016 01:17:47 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:18:39 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Olivier Matz Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, sugesh.chandran@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, jianfeng.tan@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, dprovan@bivio.net, xiao.w.wang@intel.com Message-ID: <20161013081839.GT16751@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1475485223-30566-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1475485223-30566-13-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1475485223-30566-13-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 12/12] virtio: add Tso support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 08:18:06 -0000 On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:00:23AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote: > +/* When doing TSO, the IP length is not included in the pseudo header > + * checksum of the packet given to the PMD, but for virtio it is > + * expected. > + */ > +static void > +virtio_tso_fix_cksum(struct rte_mbuf *m) > +{ > + /* common case: header is not fragmented */ > + if (likely(rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m) >= m->l2_len + m->l3_len + > + m->l4_len)) { ... > + /* replace it in the packet */ > + th->cksum = new_cksum; > + } else { ... > + /* replace it in the packet */ > + *rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, uint8_t *, > + m->l2_len + m->l3_len + 16) = new_cksum.u8[0]; > + *rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, uint8_t *, > + m->l2_len + m->l3_len + 17) = new_cksum.u8[1]; > + } The tcp header will always be in the mbuf, right? Otherwise, you can't update the cksum field here. What's the point of introducing the "else clause" then? --yliu