DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischofer@linaro.org>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	"bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"narender.vangati@intel.com" <narender.vangati@intel.com>,
	"gage.eads@intel.com" <gage.eads@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] [PATCH v2] libeventdev: event driven programming model framework for DPDK
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:22:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161014125250.GA6900@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB5PR04MB1605D0F7FAAEB2484BEFF76689DF0@DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:30:33AM +0000, Hemant Agrawal wrote:

> > > Am I reading this correctly that there is no way to support an
> > > indefinite waiting capability? Or is this just saying that if a timed
> > > wait is performed there are min/max limits for the wait duration?
> > 
> > Application can wait indefinite if required. see
> > RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_WAIT configuration option.
> > 
> > Trivial application may not need different wait values on each dequeue.This is a
> > performance optimization opportunity for implementation.
> 
>  Jerin, It is irrespective of wait configuration, whether you are using per device wait or per dequeuer wait. 
>  Can the value of MAX_U32 or MAX_U64 be treated as infinite weight? 

That will be yet another check in the fast path in the implementation, I
think, for more fine-grained wait scheme. Let application configure the device
with RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_WAIT so that the application can have
two different function pointer-based implementation for dequeue function
if required.

With RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_WAIT configuration, implicitly
MAX_U64 becomes infinite weight as the wait is uint64_t.
I can add this info in v3 if required.

Jerin

> 
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-14 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-04 21:49 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] " Vangati, Narender
2016-10-05  7:24 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-07 10:40   ` Hemant Agrawal
2016-10-09  8:27     ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-11 19:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] [PATCH v2] " Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14  4:14     ` Bill Fischofer
2016-10-14  9:26       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 10:30         ` Hemant Agrawal
2016-10-14 12:52           ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2016-10-14 15:00     ` Eads, Gage
2016-10-17  4:18       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-17 20:26         ` Eads, Gage
2016-10-18 11:19           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 16:02     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-17  5:10       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-25 17:49     ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 12:11       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2016-10-26 12:24         ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 12:54           ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-28  3:01             ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-28  8:36               ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-28  9:06                 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:25                   ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:35                     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 13:09                       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 13:56                         ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 14:54                           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 18:37         ` Vincent Jardin
2016-10-28 13:10           ` Van Haaren, Harry
2016-11-02 10:47         ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:45           ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 12:34             ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 12:43       ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-26 17:30         ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-28 13:48       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2016-10-28 14:16         ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02  8:59           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02  8:06         ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:48           ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 12:57             ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 15:00 Francois Ozog

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161014125250.GA6900@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=bill.fischofer@linaro.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=narender.vangati@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).