DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, gage.eads@intel.com, narender.vangati@intel.com,
	thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] [PATCH v2] libeventdev: event driven programming model framework for DPDK
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:00:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161026173032.GA27950@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161026124325.GA33288@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:43:25PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:19:05PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:00:16AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > Thanks to Intel and NXP folks for the positive and constructive feedback
> > > I've received so far. Here is the updated RFC(v2).
> > > 
> > > I've attempted to address as many comments as possible.
> > > 
> > > This series adds rte_eventdev.h to the DPDK tree with
> > > adequate documentation in doxygen format.
> > > 
> > > Updates are also available online:
> > > 
> > > Related draft header file (this patch):
> > > https://rawgit.com/jerinjacobk/libeventdev/master/rte_eventdev.h
> > > 
> > > PDF version(doxgen output):
> > > https://rawgit.com/jerinjacobk/libeventdev/master/librte_eventdev_v2.pdf
> > > 
> > > Repo:
> > > https://github.com/jerinjacobk/libeventdev
> > >
> > 
> > Hi Community,
> > 
> > So far, I have received constructive feedback from Intel, NXP and Linaro folks.
> > Let me know, if anyone else interested in contributing to the definition of eventdev?
> > 
> > If there are no major issues in proposed spec, then Cavium would like work on
> > implementing and up-streaming the common code(lib/librte_eventdev/) and
> > an associated HW driver.(Requested minor changes of v2 will be addressed
> > in next version).
> > 
> > We are planning to submit the work for 17.02 or 17.05 release(based on
> > how implementation goes).
> > 
> 
> Hi Jerin,

Hi Bruce,

> 
> thanks for driving this. In terms of the common code framework, when
> would you see that you might have something to upstream for that? As you
> know, we've been working on a software implementation which we are now
> looking to move to the eventdev APIs, and which also needs this common
> code to support it. 
> 
> If it can accelerate this effort, we can perhaps provide as an RFC
> the common code part that we have implemented for our work, or else we
> are happy to migrate to use common code you provide if it can be
> upstreamed fairly soon.

I have already started the common code framework. I will send the common code
as RFC in couple of days with vdev and pci bus interface.

> 
> Regards,
> /Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-26 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-04 21:49 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] " Vangati, Narender
2016-10-05  7:24 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-07 10:40   ` Hemant Agrawal
2016-10-09  8:27     ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-11 19:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] [PATCH v2] " Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14  4:14     ` Bill Fischofer
2016-10-14  9:26       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 10:30         ` Hemant Agrawal
2016-10-14 12:52           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 15:00     ` Eads, Gage
2016-10-17  4:18       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-17 20:26         ` Eads, Gage
2016-10-18 11:19           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 16:02     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-17  5:10       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-25 17:49     ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 12:11       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2016-10-26 12:24         ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 12:54           ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-28  3:01             ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-28  8:36               ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-28  9:06                 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:25                   ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:35                     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 13:09                       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 13:56                         ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 14:54                           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 18:37         ` Vincent Jardin
2016-10-28 13:10           ` Van Haaren, Harry
2016-11-02 10:47         ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:45           ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 12:34             ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-26 12:43       ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-26 17:30         ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2016-10-28 13:48       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2016-10-28 14:16         ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02  8:59           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02  8:06         ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-02 11:48           ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-02 12:57             ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-14 15:00 Francois Ozog

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161026173032.GA27950@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=narender.vangati@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).