From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B29158C5 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:39:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a197so291274231wmd.0 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:39:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3kfusNIZ0eG8hiiooxFrMiEaKkbVOVf9sSd1upjgC/Q=; b=AcjUNwwDsQMxkYe11XY2XQEi6mpXTsmpHKKqgm2Idl39b82w/gm/lZnk6GRTpqMfLX NbuJEVZdnCn7osyxVGcyOR4cee1bgszd1UDqoAFc8Inz+ka1zlZjDY/ljE/sqSWKPWTM heP/Vq6MdOXubAaTfiitOBmcsGhX6avR4tyCWCzOVYpHPGgOc/HeTNeGG7R2F5kBNSEp VLuI/1G+M/acGJ9ExgTJB6SpCo3O3aVEmoaPxCnqiFlPgd0W+9jhq366etykjrhh1ytv mrEGVcT0upMQ2X7GkKosxJLVWYrNjEjM5vmuVzQJng8VE0/nOxrkXDFRJmpDSgxhYUgC Qs0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3kfusNIZ0eG8hiiooxFrMiEaKkbVOVf9sSd1upjgC/Q=; b=XMH/2pNLQv+nWrK34SP9Of3GW2YtyBGEE9r0WjKX3Co4PtIrPOK0bYe5SczLLcs8tV ZSf+mOmFlQvRIN4pR62M8QLAg2+ccRxtPawx9ibgvxAhOF/epWANdFyp9soSJ+t/mUMd wQuJM+t5byCN17qKiGyAbQIPcDZdNxU2qWnEL7Mb/pH2UK+z0DUGMF6/+xkcOANmZCwm gJn+9rOZwqw+QEdHOk5MBt5JF/fCqyu1R6eH4pXekKg0pdAfgJBv4RiPNzmLlUug7WER cc7/bw2pSgO15HRIfybqzcV+RGe5XhTTOzDEnLIWYzA3Bj10Km7AHRMPYkDUzvXlWV35 Ybsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00qoo92IOLJqzpeA9oULwBS7dIX0n7+Kcn9esRfDWj+1e1+6+rcbvcWEZXjo4YU9Vh1 X-Received: by 10.28.136.198 with SMTP id k189mr30833210wmd.24.1480581595069; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:39:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from 6wind.com (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id yj10sm77117013wjb.3.2016.12.01.00.39.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:39:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:39:46 +0100 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: "Pei, Yulong" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Thomas Monjalon , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , Olivier Matz , "Xing, Beilei" Message-ID: <20161201083946.GJ10340@6wind.com> References: <188971FCDA171749BED5DA74ABF3E6F03946BD34@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <188971FCDA171749BED5DA74ABF3E6F03946BD34@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/22] Generic flow API (rte_flow) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 08:39:55 -0000 Hi Yulong, On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:03:53AM +0000, Pei, Yulong wrote: > Hi Adrien, > > I think that you already did test for your patchset, do you have any automated test scripts can be shared for validation since there did not have testpmd flow command documentation yet? No automated script, at least not yet. I intend to submit v2 with extra API documentation, testpmd commands with examples of expected behavior and output, as well as fixes for the issues pointed out by Nelio. -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND