From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3D82A5E for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:30:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a197so207849830wmd.0 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 01:30:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=9Xc3EVfVWDImhug/8pVgWmVBsJz9zLJ3HZMnceGt4Zg=; b=uZC/fkgeX+myteSvda/EvXlUY2c/5xazBdzQxEeCk2ggb3kd8ZK7S2+D2zNVEwNM/R E+qXWoU4qmTBpOSTct2KxSsSUNlE7rmlU9wqWkHxocW0xwKXyPATbteWwrvwPBAe3VbK O03CNuq6xWl5BzZGfBXxNN3mOosIp62oIwedtWAeQEB7ObZN5BBGWbSOn1FAwtI38Ygg 57VipuqyCKzEyTLWLEXEp6YBt15q6uvjkJotS+MYzFvdFfXr8/7NKryAhts56lZVEgDf IQnqxe4ISfLiRfm3BSHMHLEeNN7SREsHL5pTB50u8xgP8ZBz4JizwVIGSGS/3/9lj3Pk bz9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9Xc3EVfVWDImhug/8pVgWmVBsJz9zLJ3HZMnceGt4Zg=; b=SNBgOJlbHtdUO7xKE26+gOWTIe1RIx6GiBagme2qV/Ev/qMnkDCc7nyvYtmuE4xPb8 Utp2ZW7AE6GAurYWTt/LhcS+Ppwnc8mHUGb+EruM12QKEUVrdIdARZjc7XQHUQfcGJaU BarTjaVQp9pcE0DaUbau7DKQDiRP7rKJv7JgfZXuhXew5M2ofVxt6q7gRe/6lLPcQnl+ OkhSTf625nwmTScSccAnTPmBRpPOGPGCXzvnSsQLmgRq7kgzOym7NUcNgLPLDu6JXtsL 36Ey+Kn5hG2jmZys2+knH8f/u8ThvxH2uHLtmz1LqgftA3YioG55xflcZ6rUrlMEQoa8 4Q2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC034XHfMjqbyG40lJ1ZcF2BehnH70TW4LeJiLkcpmZNMimlVPx5ricOZyHnPCzOZjqm1 X-Received: by 10.28.95.197 with SMTP id t188mr1165870wmb.99.1481189413595; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 01:30:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from autoinstall.dev.6wind.com (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d10sm35931442wja.20.2016.12.08.01.30.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Dec 2016 01:30:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:30:05 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=E9lio?= Laranjeiro To: dev@dpdk.org, "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Bruce Richardson , "Wiles, Keith" , Morten =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= , Neil Horman Cc: wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, Olivier Matz Message-ID: <20161208093005.GD21794@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: introduce big and little endian types X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 09:30:14 -0000 Hi all, Following previous discussions, I would like to gather requirements for v2, currently we have: 1. Introduction of new typedefs. 2. Modification of network headers. 3. Modification of rte_*_to_*() functions. Point 1. seems not to be an issue, everyone seems to agree on the fact having those types could help to document some parts of the code. Point 2. does not cause any ABI change as it is only a documentation commit, not sure if anyone disagrees about this. Point 3. documentation commit most people are uncomfortable with. I propose to drop it from v2. Any objection to this plan? -- Nélio Laranjeiro 6WIND