From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix required tools list layout
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:11:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161218191100.nzgn2w7465qnk26v@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE202686088@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi John,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:09:32PM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Baruch Siach [mailto:baruch at tkos.co.il]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 10:04 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; David Marchand
> > <david.marchand at 6wind.com>; Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
> > Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix required tools list layout
> >
> > The Python requirement should appear in the bullet list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
> > ---
> > doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst
> > b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst
> > index 3d743421595a..621cc9ddaef6 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst
> > @@ -84,9 +84,7 @@ Compilation of the DPDK
> > x86_x32 ABI is currently supported with distribution packages only on
> > Ubuntu
> > higher than 13.10 or recent Debian distribution. The only supported
> > compiler is gcc 4.9+.
> >
> > -.. note::
> > -
> > - Python, version 2.6 or 2.7, to use various helper scripts included in
> > the DPDK package.
> > +* Python, version 2.6 or 2.7, to use various helper scripts included in
> > the DPDK package.
>
> In addition to this change the note on the previous item should be indented
> to the level of the bullet item. It is probably worth making that change at
> the same time.
All items are equally aligned as far as I can see. The 32bit on 64bit
requirement bullets are sub-items of the previous item. Am I missing anything?
> Also, the Python version should probably say 2.7+ and 3.2+ if this patch is
> accepted:
>
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/17775/
>
> However, since that change hasn't been acked/merged yet you can leave that
> part of your patch as it is and I'll fix the version numbers in the other
> patch.
Note that your updated patch[1] conflicts with this one.
[1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/18152/
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-18 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-13 10:03 Baruch Siach
2016-12-15 15:09 ` Mcnamara, John
2016-12-18 19:11 ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2016-12-18 20:50 ` Mcnamara, John
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161218191100.nzgn2w7465qnk26v@tarshish \
--to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).