From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8427A98
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 07:26:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Dec 2016 22:26:36 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,404,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1076304999"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Dec 2016 22:26:34 -0800
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:28:21 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, cunming.liang@intel.com
Message-ID: <20161226062821.GB19288@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1480689075-66977-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <1482477266-39199-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <1482477266-39199-4-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1482477266-39199-4-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/7] net/virtio_user: move vhost user
	specific code
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 06:26:37 -0000

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 07:14:22AM +0000, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> To support vhost kernel as the backend of net_virtio_user in coming
> patches, we move vhost_user specific structs and macros into
> vhost_user.c, and only keep common definitions in vhost.h.

Good.

> Besides, remove VHOST_USER_MQ feature check, it will be added back
> in following multiqueue patch.

Why then?

	--yliu