From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F84B6D for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:16:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2017 04:16:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,283,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="57045913" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.61]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2017 04:16:34 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:16:34 +0000 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:16:34 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170125121633.GA20524@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20170125121456.GA24344@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170125121456.GA24344@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Research and =?iso-8859-1?Q?De=ACvel?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?opment?= Ireland Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_ring features in use (or not) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:16:37 -0000 On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:14:56PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Hi all, > > while looking at the rte_ring code, I'm wondering if we can simplify > that a bit by removing some of the code it in that may not be used. > Specifically: > > * Does anyone use the NIC stats functionality for debugging? I've By NIC stat, I mean ring stats here! Too much ethernet on the brain! :-( /Bruce > certainly never seen it used, and it's presence makes the rest less > readable. Can it be dropped? >