From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f43.google.com (mail-pg0-f43.google.com [74.125.83.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122B2952 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:49:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id 14so51560130pgg.1 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:49:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oDQdjxONJ3Fsa6Ieikb1C3Shn9MTfkbF59EL7kEl4Zk=; b=krXEz/xIDHLKkD4jh1SvH5YKvjXzrMmiisHhoKZqK54G4TqpL6DSTbs4DZj51oDr8o ORi+STOx3OpdfBFs7WItckpgsGseu561M3uSRMBWFf66O3ImXAmLJg1TZL99eYK7mB0/ MqkQLqQNHa/o+JVO+XcTu7/eTquGpzba0ecQ8XRipasahudGIaP6LIAy3lraQFemE5sQ mUMiT8PEDl4elIYQrJ6ADo9KFX0SJVEzXX6zZa/EFfkUbcKR273ee3wMRLynMZuw0SU/ RitcRbDkNKAZL7kTFNZWZ1zz9xTbRTuV3oynaMcGpsHA82yDpZWOGXEqby08cQB8aEi6 FQTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oDQdjxONJ3Fsa6Ieikb1C3Shn9MTfkbF59EL7kEl4Zk=; b=L5Xi6up6LWFRZ7X3Pc1DnDHAmszg4naHv3/lotgogoDUzwBptvWxsQLTfkkAMyTNV3 VghgrDcM4hyHz1VfKhevOfcDosqfPFVjqz2FyxTcPahUHthyyD91uA4TIG0LkhdMqy9H 7JTdAdTURZclbgfY7UKyq1epyjYpXqaEaJAvf80Qn7S7L81MxW8tPuDqZpokpcX2k37X hZYpt+MBw95j4tD4a3319z3UqntYXEh0u+kCgr7gOU74Oguik2iLt5OLVegxopu16S/B IadnhwWce7ACWx6m94/05hGkCn+9M985KY27Mfwpd9H/FSh/xff1GLqQqMXraoupu82z b5ZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLA49zULRCEWqfm5wvgczn+bfDwpDXjBCeGCVWygmVFD3lzSIvZpsKeqZgcX8O39w== X-Received: by 10.99.105.8 with SMTP id e8mr29130245pgc.217.1486594193246; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:49:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (204-195-18-65.wavecable.com. [204.195.18.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t87sm22881748pfe.59.2017.02.08.14.49.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:49:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:49:45 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Chen Jing D(Mark)" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, keith.wiles@intel.com, gerald.rogers@intel.com Message-ID: <20170208144945.0ce116ee@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <1484882498-18653-3-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> References: <1484882498-18653-1-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> <1484882498-18653-3-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/2] prgdev: introduce generic prgdev API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 22:49:54 -0000 On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:21:38 +0800 "Chen Jing D(Mark)" wrote: > +struct rte_prg_dev_info { > + struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< Device PCI information. */ NAK No new API should refer to PCI devices. We are trying to make all references to devices generic. Crypto suceeded, ether is in process, but no new ones please.