DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
Cc: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eventdev: amend comments for events limit and threshold
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:23:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213075259.GA20127@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0401MB2514C7CCECDB683CC794199BE6470@AM5PR0401MB2514.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 09:48:57AM +0000, Nipun Gupta wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Van Haaren, Harry [mailto:harry.van.haaren@intel.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 16:02
> > To: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>;
> > jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com; Richardson, Bruce
> > <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Eads, Gage <gage.eads@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] eventdev: amend comments for events limit and
> > threshold
> > 
> > > From: Nipun Gupta [mailto:nipun.gupta@nxp.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 3:50 PM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com;
> > Richardson, Bruce
> > > <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Eads, Gage <gage.eads@intel.com>; Van
> > Haaren, Harry
> > > <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>; Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2] eventdev: amend comments for events limit and threshold
> > >
> > > Updated the comments on 'nb_events_limit' of 'struct rte_event_dev_config'
> > > and 'new_event_threshold' of 'struct rte_event_port_conf' for open system
> > > configuration.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes for v2:
> > >  - Fix errors reported by check-git-log.sh
> > >
> > >  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 12 +++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > > index c2f9310..171e52e 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > > @@ -404,11 +404,12 @@ struct rte_event_dev_config {
> > >  	 * @see RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_TIMEOUT
> > >  	 */
> > >  	int32_t nb_events_limit;
> > > -	/**< Applies to *closed system* event dev only. This field indicates a
> > > -	 * limit to ethdev-like devices to limit the number of events injected
> > > -	 * into the system to not overwhelm core-to-core events.
> > > +	/**< In a *closed system* this field indicates a limit to ethdev-like
> > > +	 * devices to limit the number of events injected into the system to
> > > +	 * not overwhelm core-to-core events.
> > >  	 * This value cannot exceed the *max_num_events* which previously
> > > -	 * provided in rte_event_dev_info_get()
> > > +	 * provided in rte_event_dev_info_get().
> > > +	 * This should be set to '-1' for *open system*.
> > 
> > 
> > I don't think we should mention ethdev explicitly here - it applies to any
> > port that is attempting to enqueue work into a closed-system eventdev.
> > 
> > What do you think of the following wording? (Suggestion only, feel free to
> > re-word if required).
> > 
> > /**< In a closed system this field is the limit on the maximum number of events
> >      that can be inflight in the eventdev at a given time. The limit is required
> >      to ensure that the finite space in a closed system is not overwhelmed. The
> >      value cannot exceed the *max_num_events* as provided by
> > rte_event_dev_info_get().
> >      This value should be set to -1 for open systems.
> >  */
> 
> I agree with you Harry. For *closed systems*, this limit should be valid on all the
> enqueues, whether from ethdev type devices or enqueue's from core.
> 
> BTW, do you use event limit both on event device and on event ports in your
> software implementation? Because I think the limit may be only per event port.
> 
> Jerin,
> 
> Your views on this for open systems would be very helpful. Thanks.

I think, none of the implementations can have _true_ infinite amount of inflight
buffers. In our implementation, we internal fixed size SRAM for storing
inflight events which are backed by DDR(To mimic the infinite space).
But both are fixed size and configurable.
That would translate to use only struct rte_event_dev_config.nb_events_limit in
our implementation.
If the implementation support port level configuration then it can
use struct rte_event_port_conf.new_event_threshold.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-13  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-10 15:05 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eventdev: amend comments for nb_events_limit and new_event_threshold Nipun Gupta
2017-02-10 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eventdev: amend comments for events limit and threshold Nipun Gupta
2017-02-10 10:31   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-02-11  9:48     ` Nipun Gupta
2017-02-13  7:53       ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2017-02-14 12:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Nipun Gupta
2017-02-15 13:53   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-02-15 14:56     ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170213075259.GA20127@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=nipun.gupta@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).