From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50802201 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:37:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from aserv0021.oracle.com (aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id v1GDb580009477 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:37:05 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1GDb51b009182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:37:05 GMT Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1GDb2GF007418; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:37:04 GMT Received: from dhcp-whq-twvpn-1-vpnpool-10-159-157-38.vpn.oracle.com (/10.159.157.38) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 05:37:02 -0800 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:36:58 -0500 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Tan, Jianfeng" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, Xen-devel Message-ID: <20170216133657.GB14695@dhcp-whq-twvpn-1-vpnpool-10-159-157-38.vpn.oracle.com> References: <1478504326-68105-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <83319780-26e9-afb6-74cd-20c07dad04a7@intel.com> <1915354.hxpEe7tUeI@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1915354.hxpEe7tUeI@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:57:28 +0100 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:37:08 -0000 On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:06:18PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng: > > Hi Thomas and Konrad, > > > > On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: > > >>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to > > >>> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the > > >>> maintainer of all xen-related files. > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan > > >> Applied > > >> > > >> Please Jianfeng, could you start your new role by sending a status > > >> of Xen dom0 support in DPDK? I think there are some issues in latest releases. > > > > Yes, I'm on this. And hope to send out update in the next week. > > > > > Pls also CC me and xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org if possible. > > > > Glad to do that. > > > > Thanks, > > Jianfeng > > Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK? > > I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community. > Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not > fixed yet: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html > > The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html > > Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting for review of xen-devel to the spec. And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0 parts of code in DPDK.