From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8372BB1 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:10:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Mar 2017 04:10:52 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,225,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="70902994" Received: from bdejong-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.4.230]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 01 Mar 2017 04:10:49 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:10:49 +0000 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:10:49 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Wiles, Keith" , Olivier MATZ , Jerin Jacob , "Yigit, Ferruh" , dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170301121048.GA31112@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20170123181813.00567e47@platinum> <20170124155000.2341e579@glumotte.dev.6wind.com> <26118650.GOHWFKqnEF@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <26118650.GOHWFKqnEF@xps13> Organization: Intel Research and =?iso-8859-1?Q?De=ACvel?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?opment?= Ireland Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: optimize directory dependencies X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:10:54 -0000 On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:25:45PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2017-01-24 14:55, Wiles, Keith: > > > On Jan 24, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:26:41 +0000, "Richardson, Bruce" > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Ok. Point taken for the lower-core count parts. > > >> > > >> Thomas - can at least one of these patches be merged into 17.02, > > >> since it will definitely help us developers? [If Olivier's is too big > > >> a change at this point in the cycle, can Ferruh's be taken as an > > >> intermediate fix for this release before merging Olivier's in 17.05?] > > > > > > It looks to be a good option. Ferruh's patch is less risky for 17.02. > > > > +1 for Ferruh’s version now and Olivier’s later as it does not require -j. > > The Ferruh's version has been merged in 17.02. > Are we still OK to take Olivier's version in 17.05? > No objection on my side. /Bruce