From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C256CFA6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  9 Mar 2017 10:11:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 09 Mar 2017 01:11:26 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,268,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="1106546225"
Received: from kryan2-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.21.182])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 09 Mar 2017 01:11:24 -0800
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 09 Mar 2017 09:11:23 +0000
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:11:23 +0000
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Message-ID: <20170309091122.GA302480@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20170227161811.12309-1-aconole@redhat.com>
 <20170228185315.12546-1-aconole@redhat.com>
 <3101203.dHUXMUouNS@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3101203.dHUXMUouNS@xps13>
Organization: Intel Research and =?iso-8859-1?Q?De=ACvel?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?opment?= Ireland Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/26] linux/eal: Remove most causes of
 panic on init
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 09:11:28 -0000

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:58:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the work.
> I think it needs to be completed to have the same behaviour on bsdapp.

Ideally, yes, but I also don't think the lack of BSD changes should
block the inclusion of this set. In terms of application writers, the
apps don't need to be written differently for BSD compared to Linux
because of this change. All that is different is that the BSD version
will panic rather than return the error code. 

Regards,
/Bruce

>