DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	raman geetha gopalakrishnan <glowingsun@gmail.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, users <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Reg DPDK with unsupported NIC
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:24:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314222402.1648a719@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170315044502.GA7360@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 04:45:03 +0000
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:07:42PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 3/14/2017 9:28 AM, raman geetha gopalakrishnan wrote:  
> > > Hi ,
> > > 
> > > Please find my query, Currently i am planning to develop DPDK APP (linux
> > > env). I do not have DPDK supported NIC. Till then i would still like to
> > > develop DPDK APP and want DPDK  to use OS interface to TX/RX packets from
> > > NIC. How can i make it?   
> >   
> > > I went through KNI and my understanding is you
> > > cannot use it - is this correct?  
> > 
> > You can use it. KNI does not require a physical device at all.
> > 
> > But with the KNI support in main tree, you need to use KNI specific
> > APIs, - which KNI sample app shows.
> > 
> > With the KNI PMD in next-net tree, it is possible to use KNI as any
> > other device.
> >  
> 
> Just my 2c. While you can indeed use KNI here, I think I would recommend
> pcap or AF_PACKET as my first-choice options, with TAP also a
> possibility too, as Keith has already suggested.
> 
> /Bruce

Other than development environment, why would you want to use DPDK with AF_PACKET
or TAP?  It will be slower than kernel networking and with KNI doubly slow.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-15  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-14  9:28 raman geetha gopalakrishnan
2017-03-14  9:31 ` Gémes Géza
2017-03-15  5:12   ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-03-14  9:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-03-14 10:13   ` raman geetha gopalakrishnan
2017-03-14  9:52 ` Wiles, Keith
2017-03-14 10:13   ` raman geetha gopalakrishnan
2017-03-14 12:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-03-15  4:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2017-03-15  5:24     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170314222402.1648a719@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=glowingsun@gmail.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).