From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f181.google.com (mail-wr0-f181.google.com [209.85.128.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35C1CF90 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:22:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u108so56242389wrb.3 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:22:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jOjs1FOgs+lq25p4UjebOgV5FKKyAdOdLDA8o4jFyI8=; b=tSNwCgpaMViR5Tv8NRWRxy/eVgZ0+GGSkK/ZFz6lDfENfVmuy2abOTDiALDj80c83v InY++23S/uGLqeuB6D1wwQGsOuvrNCew+zjgiij14JJKmB15ILlfFqxAtnk9XrCqz5Ln oSfkLIUZPiwiU9Dlzsz2yV4821vfw+KkK8JNQrm/Gj7JrUl/bwBvMuNHJdsS7HFanyks fLohd81uIoGWj88MtFHp5ZwPyhvtr2on4KHCWI4n4Z6BtL2lBQz3wDdmK4nufVZHksvu CvAJRDfL2SaCkBpvqg/Am2JUrFDGTktaL5Ulq+GAXt6b63pfztNLcv0sbK6MLtJ1RB4Y ZprA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jOjs1FOgs+lq25p4UjebOgV5FKKyAdOdLDA8o4jFyI8=; b=FmuyGpv/Hz+g9uPyq2BLgt3swMvINqMCG1nIf2kXeBS+mg1RIN7bTXFCxR7DGTRHdO ucGhIEW36q1jzMHRMzoTlaoViHIKtMHXayBkXfk+xEZ13t7IBlMFMMJ2M6eI/cT19jGm k9lTbnzh9FsmMmzP4iKnxzmPnfGVl2T2Qt+fMO/tBT3SeyVLDqNOFpQCSQWPIaFQHss4 RKYUXKFGilSiZKWai43PRq/i5gK6RFy1ipOd0hA1y3RTqC1jrW027Mage8qPDXQNZgp+ N68BeuJxn6CR0tug84Q4DgsxaFf5llf0No98oVHS5zJQ0wZoAGptvvHO1l00Ew/LQQEk uEKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1bvlkxavkfrhfMCIDygFSWmN9qRQDiaF9xeqELqTo6tCUXlrK1yfnzgnu1Nts5uMvP X-Received: by 10.223.151.138 with SMTP id s10mr15302804wrb.35.1489771356155; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from platinum (2a01cb0c03c651000226b0fffeed02fc.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb0c:3c6:5100:226:b0ff:feed:2fc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m201sm3346068wmd.19.2017.03.17.10.22.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:22:33 +0100 From: Olivier Matz To: Hemant Agrawal Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "dev@dpdk.org" , Shreyansh Jain , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" Message-ID: <20170317182233.27374d4e@platinum> In-Reply-To: References: <1489754838-1455-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <3431506.qvV2pjYT76@xps13> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] NXP DPAA2 External Mempool Driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:22:37 -0000 On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:12:59 +0000, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 7:13 PM > > To: Hemant Agrawal > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; olivier.matz@6wind.com; Shreyansh Jain > > ; ferruh.yigit@intel.com > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] NXP DPAA2 External Mempool Driver > > > > 2017-03-17 18:17, Hemant Agrawal: > > > (This patches has been split from DPAA2 PMD v8 series [1] as per > > > comments received on ML [2].) > > > > > > This patch implements the HW mempool offload driver for packets > > > buffers using the FSLMC provided DPBP object. > > > > > > The new pool is being configured using compile time option and pool > > > name as "dpaa2". > > > > > > Dependency: > > > This patchset is based on "NXP DPAA2 FSLMC Bus Driver" patchset [3]. > > > > > > References: > > > [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/059000.html > > > [2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/059789.html > > > [3] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/060453.html > > > > I'm sorry, I think there is misunderstanding. > > We were saying that you should move the existing mempool handlers first. > > Have you submitted a patch for the ring and stack mempool handlers? > [Hemant] > > I will do it. But that work is independent of NXP patches? Isn't it? I'd say the existing handlers have to be moved first, to avoid to have a state where there are handlers at 2 different locations. So to me, it's just a chronological dependency. Regards, Olivier