From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <aconole@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CAC11C5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:19:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD769683EF;
 Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:19:44 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com DD769683EF
Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com DD769683EF
Received: from dhcp-25-97.bos.redhat.com (unknown [10.18.25.172])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589CA18210;
 Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:19:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:19:30 -0400
Message-Id: <20170322201940.24028-5-aconole@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170322201940.24028-1-aconole@redhat.com>
References: <20170322201940.24028-1-aconole@redhat.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:19:45 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 04/14] eal: do not panic if parsing args
	returns error
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:19:44 -0000

It's possible that the application could take a corrective action here,
and either prompt the user for different arguments, or at least perform
a better logging.  Exiting this early prevents any useful information
gathering from the application layer.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c   | 8 ++++++--
 lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
index 60de9f9..ab34c0d 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
@@ -528,8 +528,12 @@ rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
 	}
 
 	fctret = eal_parse_args(argc, argv);
-	if (fctret < 0)
-		exit(1);
+	if (fctret < 0) {
+		rte_eal_init_alert("Invalid 'command line' arguments.");
+		rte_errno = EINVAL;
+		rte_atomic32_clear(&run_once);
+		return -1;
+	}
 
 	if (internal_config.no_hugetlbfs == 0 &&
 			internal_config.process_type != RTE_PROC_SECONDARY &&
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
index 161f726..a671ed4 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
@@ -785,8 +785,12 @@ rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
 	}
 
 	fctret = eal_parse_args(argc, argv);
-	if (fctret < 0)
-		exit(1);
+	if (fctret < 0) {
+		rte_eal_init_alert("Invalid 'command line' arguments.");
+		rte_errno = EINVAL;
+		rte_atomic32_clear(&run_once);
+		return -1;
+	}
 
 	if (internal_config.no_hugetlbfs == 0 &&
 			internal_config.process_type != RTE_PROC_SECONDARY &&
-- 
2.9.3