From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f46.google.com (mail-pg0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C01271 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 21:51:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 21so130240379pgg.1 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 12:51:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CV2SNWPgtiduK6muk4XqMsgl5Xj+4VqVxHy9iU4Por8=; b=CoV1I1O9nWmvs/ogbQ5vQcA290IGGsL6FCzwK4jCuqKhGn4otLUX2jVboLM2PkiF+z rLyYF9L5CoUYxXn7AFII0divLVrI4tKHGEc2/GVXv0a7UGiwdecF9xyIlXzSjfIvE66M oP73NsVPq8T1osUWhVOX9lnfDcClCdC1TQ8R4pvg0SgvATPwV6E7jR0eKCJQuhPVxEqt A7xClnIrA9407OuWpVpJSPqCqFwY0+TsCzRYr0QvKA42V/4xkDlGjWR2ddv8cXnzrN2Y 4d2xzRQ4dY4m7Vyyx4uVwGy7RaYluAXLKeWkeR9NyvmiVC8lEz1HZJhHuLrZUBDT6/hA iAPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CV2SNWPgtiduK6muk4XqMsgl5Xj+4VqVxHy9iU4Por8=; b=INSSixpUuNyEo3BimNrdlJcNQAV92s+3SBdPZkV1HgI0wHZs4cmdlJ+mpi6BWQ1Pm0 E1th1RcYwY5igCSi16QbKeJrz8iW27018rHX5DDj0SSZpGAEoIISa7oSY5NLeRqeMAxS XUEx5kBd7um5gjXfhnZGUvlN2fZjOGU1EiyuvI498YUQbNglIbRZ4DpNd6qVGwTZipn6 Ccs+aVFl2AU0n5nOlQFtm+eLOjKk/7HfF1JzlsmVlzxt/vbkEuQg6nkFA8vESuZQ+ozC HF9dUun9TCT4286uNh2KqnRDcBsoHxdwm/ffjcrgm8JuEmZStRpSDMzzYzwyiVeMgmBx E2BA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3zW7FPAtD9b7gqH06W7MMa51HKPDXw6tA75FUDVGrwSlIQROyvplk05BvnYKIObQ== X-Received: by 10.98.110.193 with SMTP id j184mr19128386pfc.228.1491249072510; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 12:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from plumbers-lap.home.lan (cpe-98-155-35-236.hawaii.res.rr.com. [98.155.35.236]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d63sm27395532pfg.132.2017.04.03.12.51.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Apr 2017 12:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:51:07 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" Cc: Jay Rolette , "Wiles, Keith" , Olivier Matz , Jerin Jacob , "dev@dpdk.org" , "techboard@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20170403125107.2c23bfc0@plumbers-lap.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D89126527834A9@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20170330094058.nh2nhk4ko6tsqedn@localhost.localdomain> <20170330170512.14476bb0@platinum> <5C76150C-195D-4316-AC3B-6AE2441B254B@intel.com> <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D89126527834A9@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-06 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 19:51:13 -0000 On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:09:04 +0000 "Dumitrescu, Cristian" wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette > > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:03 PM > > To: Wiles, Keith > > Cc: Olivier Matz ; Jerin Jacob > > ; dev@dpdk.org; techboard@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-06 > >=20 > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Wiles, Keith > > wrote: > >=20 > > =20 > > > > > > My Soap box comment: > > > I think we are limiting DPDK=E2=80=99s growth by only focusing on = a few new > > > PMDs and reworking the existing code. We need to look forward and gro= w =20 > > DPDK =20 > > > as a community to get more people involved in adding more application= s =20 > > and =20 > > > new designs. I believe DPDK.org needs to be a bigger community and no= t =20 > > just =20 > > > a I/O library called DPDK. We need to actively move the organization = to > > > include more then just a high speed I/O library. Some will focus on D= PDK > > > and others will focus on providing a higher level applications, libra= ries > > > and features. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Keith > > > =20 > >=20 > > Yes! =20 >=20 > +1 Yes but it needs some architecture. Sorry but the features flying in are just addressing single use cases and have no unifying model.