From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mempool: introduce flag to indicate hw mempool
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 17:19:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170403171958.5ff2f3ab@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491210729-9755-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Hi Hemant,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:42:09 +0530, Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:
> Hardware pools need to distinguish between buffers allocated using
> software or hardware backed pools.
>
> Some HW NICs may choose to autonomously free the pickets during
> transmit if the packet is from HW pool. While they should not do
> it for software backed pools.
>
> Such flag would also help when multiple pools are being handled by
> a PMD, saving costly compare operations for any internal marker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> index 991feaa..91dbd21 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> @@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ struct rte_mempool {
> #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET 0x0008 /**< Default get is "single-consumer".*/
> #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED 0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */
> #define MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
> +#define MEMPOOL_F_HW_POOL (1 << ((sizeof(int) * 8) - 1)) /**< Internal:
> + * Hardware offloaded pool. This information may be used by the
> + * NIC or other hw. Some NICs autonomously free the HW backed pool packets. */
> +
> +/**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
>
> /**
> * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.
One thing is still not clear to me: in your driver, you check this flag:
- if it is unset, you reallocate a packet from your hw pool, you copy
some metadata, and you send it to the hw.
- if it is set, you assume that you can call mempool_to_bpid(mp) and directly
send it to the hw.
I think this is not correct. The test you want to do in your driver is:
"is it the pool that I registered for my hardware"?
It is not:
"is it a hardware managed pool?".
I think what you are doing here prevents to use 2 hardware mempools
at the same time, because they would all have this flag, and mempool_to_bpid()
would probably crash.
Instead, can't you just compare the mempool pointer to a value stored internally
in the driver?
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-03 9:12 Hemant Agrawal
2017-04-03 15:19 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2017-04-04 5:35 ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-04-04 6:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-04 7:29 ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-04-04 9:13 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-04-04 7:48 ` Olivier MATZ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170403171958.5ff2f3ab@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).