From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb0-f173.google.com (mail-yb0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A645A3E for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:17:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id s22so47883141ybe.3 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:17:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=COGwxNmFSwcTdupLNAydkt3VCWL4ptIgBZ8awQ42U8o=; b=fogyC8LHlc9BHKxl5VUUAyd2mNPmB25KPyyMDcQZksPheuAIdF6j2P4UEg4I3xRr0i T4TbSB7Z3sDdz0me92biDgnIb7ul9JUJUd6kAQhd0tzqXQqXz/kBsic5Uto+IBg310O7 wXF3/AyYQ8mSW+mLDQwMYS5IMDMNOVxd3L/5Irp328DsKxyS4vAzlMYLDEnVqaMgZRA2 yRix2be5UULAYMcgmkPrHlIB0v7XxZ7A9cGRKejEJwH2qdIBHfZgLRaHF+2eVGoshzfz Rx4Uo6MKTCEyBOcbrwtRz6qwMUfwz++qZJWd9Tg2n8cev5jbq51noW3z1o2gEJiXNdCV WsMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=COGwxNmFSwcTdupLNAydkt3VCWL4ptIgBZ8awQ42U8o=; b=qL/fVgRzN98G6AY6N28nL5c68vOEjYSNBGD4sdsCOaEDq6vp5P+uEeecZHCqeMAx47 YibXGmFVyIZ1wb0kiryHyIo3Iou9vl2nB6O/9jxXhFJlPzaIO8CakQRBXU4IodLOy7f2 6KDhyaB99mlIAmxrrmRaWE8Qt/ldJiF9jM9xq72SrR3IXB3v9Tlew+gx2qqGaKAAarrc ZCTaG3cQW9f3nWhi+mBt92P5AatyZH2hmZfacmSfZhjMymvEK1R3YT7RTPsMIcXmM4r0 KqW/JUJ6XjGew1gZtCsk/uuZu8GwnM0vvGW/7eK7+YKTe8MLYgKZF7PeLGUrubqW7Qth cItA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4nvAGG7uKfnAotG4FvS4ZT5PIrf97u73iUDJ1zcOg8AzlkiCOM 9VmKDBYxOgNkUw== X-Received: by 10.98.37.198 with SMTP id l189mr13409365pfl.38.1492795044260; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (76-14-206-252.or.wavecable.com. [76.14.206.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e71sm3101085pgc.17.2017.04.21.10.17.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:17:21 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Anupam Kapoor Cc: Gal Sagie , "" Message-ID: <20170421101721.6b9e3bd9@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ebpf support in dpdk X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:17:25 -0000 On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:23:13 +0530 Anupam Kapoor wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: >=20 > > I have a feeling you are talking about P4.... =20 >=20 >=20 > =E2=80=8Bwell, not p4, but more specifically 'protocol-oblivious-forwardi= ng' (POF). > ebpf can describe both match+action rules on dpdk... >=20 > -- > kind regards > anupam >=20 > In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and Emacs > was the lambda. There is already a userspace eBPF library, why does DPDK have to (re)invent= everything? https://github.com/tuxology/libebpf