From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946F25587 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:10:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2017 22:10:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,387,1488873600"; d="scan'208";a="81648040" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2017 22:10:43 -0700 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:07:16 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> To: Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, bruce.richardson@intel.com Message-ID: <20170428050716.GU11512@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1493310859-49106-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <1493334014-69488-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1493334014-69488-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] config: make AVX and AVX512 configurable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 05:10:48 -0000 On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:00:14PM -0400, Zhihong Wang wrote: > Making AVX and AVX512 configurable is useful for performance and power > testing. > > The similar kernel patch at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9618883/. > > AVX512 support like in rte_memcpy has been in DPDK since 16.04, but it's > still unproven in rich use cases in hardware. Therefore it's marked as > experimental for now, will enable it after enough field test and possible > optimization. > > Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> --yliu