* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk bugfix
@ 2017-05-05 13:29 Gregory Etelson
2017-05-05 13:54 ` Olivier Matz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Etelson @ 2017-05-05 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
bugfix in rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk
Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io>
---
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
index 466ec00..bebe94f 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
@@ -788,6 +788,12 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(struct rte_mbuf *m, uint16_t new_value)
void
rte_mbuf_sanity_check(const struct rte_mbuf *m, int is_header);
+#define MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(m_) \
+ RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m_) == 1); \
+ RTE_ASSERT(m_->next == NULL); \
+ RTE_ASSERT(m_->nb_segs == 1); \
+ __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m_, 0);
+
/**
* Allocate an unitialized mbuf from mempool *mp*.
*
@@ -815,11 +821,7 @@ static inline struct rte_mbuf *rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(struct rte_mempool *mp)
if (rte_mempool_get(mp, &mb) < 0)
return NULL;
m = (struct rte_mbuf *)mb;
- RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1);
- RTE_ASSERT(m->next == NULL);
- RTE_ASSERT(m->nb_segs == 1);
- __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 0);
-
+ MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(m);
return m;
}
@@ -1152,23 +1154,19 @@ static inline int rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(struct rte_mempool *pool,
switch (count % 4) {
case 0:
while (idx != count) {
- RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0);
- rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1);
+ MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]);
rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]);
idx++;
case 3:
- RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0);
- rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1);
+ MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]);
rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]);
idx++;
case 2:
- RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0);
- rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1);
+ MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]);
rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]);
idx++;
case 1:
- RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0);
- rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1);
+ MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]);
rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]);
idx++;
}
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk bugfix
2017-05-05 13:29 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk bugfix Gregory Etelson
@ 2017-05-05 13:54 ` Olivier Matz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Matz @ 2017-05-05 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gregory Etelson; +Cc: dev
Hi Gregory,
On Fri, 05 May 2017 16:29:59 +0300, Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io> wrote:
> bugfix in rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io>
Thank you for the fix. I suggest the following title instead:
mbuf: fix bulk allocation when debug enabled
Please refer to the guidelines:
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html#commit-messages-subject-line
A description would have been welcome, for instance:
The debug assertions when allocating a raw mbuf are not correct since
commit 8f094a9ac5d7 ("mbuf: set mbuf fields while in pool"),
which triggers a panic when using this function in debug mode.
Change the expected number of segments to 1 instead of 0, and
factorize these sanity checks.
Fixes: 8f094a9ac5d7 ("mbuf: set mbuf fields while in pool")
Can you please submit a v2 with these changes? You can validate
your changes with checkpatches.sh and check-git-log.sh.
Thanks,
Olivier
> ---
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> index 466ec00..bebe94f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> @@ -788,6 +788,12 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(struct rte_mbuf *m, uint16_t new_value)
> void
> rte_mbuf_sanity_check(const struct rte_mbuf *m, int is_header);
>
> +#define MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(m_) \
> + RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m_) == 1); \
> + RTE_ASSERT(m_->next == NULL); \
> + RTE_ASSERT(m_->nb_segs == 1); \
> + __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m_, 0);
> +
> /**
> * Allocate an unitialized mbuf from mempool *mp*.
> *
> @@ -815,11 +821,7 @@ static inline struct rte_mbuf *rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(struct rte_mempool *mp)
> if (rte_mempool_get(mp, &mb) < 0)
> return NULL;
> m = (struct rte_mbuf *)mb;
> - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1);
> - RTE_ASSERT(m->next == NULL);
> - RTE_ASSERT(m->nb_segs == 1);
> - __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 0);
> -
> + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(m);
> return m;
> }
>
> @@ -1152,23 +1154,19 @@ static inline int rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(struct rte_mempool *pool,
> switch (count % 4) {
> case 0:
> while (idx != count) {
> - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0);
> - rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1);
> + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]);
> rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]);
> idx++;
> case 3:
> - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0);
> - rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1);
> + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]);
> rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]);
> idx++;
> case 2:
> - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0);
> - rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1);
> + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]);
> rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]);
> idx++;
> case 1:
> - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0);
> - rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1);
> + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]);
> rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]);
> idx++;
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-05 13:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-05 13:29 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk bugfix Gregory Etelson
2017-05-05 13:54 ` Olivier Matz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).