From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com (mail-wr0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.128.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1515968C1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 00:10:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z52so18499428wrc.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
 :content-disposition:in-reply-to;
 bh=sbKQc2G0OatvogDup7+n3wp6HKTMza63PZJ0kLpnNvg=;
 b=0AwZlsI6QY+kUrgS1yV+NM/3RDY+iKRrInK3K1VoOur3SkTUDipuPS9MFlzQ50Lldb
 7h6o0FGgx13FzcvvIsQjPRLizM2f8DfRvjV/39+a7VWiJPL7r5BRmPSCWQ6CrMWeDTQo
 7wrrhkbBAq769FQFBeF8qUjRruomc8k1axVWOFC8Qwmgaojytob2X29CszN3+icbzWcL
 f4afofM0Dnw0sAl5o0JeyGCa9G/Kblhcgkb0atpwUeLlIUjKpF9OSytOJFYZCvbSdRDz
 FE81QTwaNXAjCBW1pLlxOvVNBI46NsA+ygUBN3u5JtpSFFieRTkmpiRg5FVT50gPcrRI
 T9tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references
 :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
 bh=sbKQc2G0OatvogDup7+n3wp6HKTMza63PZJ0kLpnNvg=;
 b=Yv2TydbE+vkN13SM2E9eEALjRRoHR3WDglMAyMgHRIaI4dPYiaxb6bpISM+QMCCEAj
 9mz/Q/+PochnmTuJXkoxffyiW49hxxJ5RwFCQj04uNt+pQorSGWYwNtpZjY6Vasw6lGP
 IoTvGFRss4fGylyXqEKbB3pG3dpFdPcdBhEbgkS9YDRngeJSt1cYGajsJbj9yX40ihNH
 DL/RyZByNbmXSj6XOr7RPEmEBEp44EUF8VykIFuNrEN7I1Ln2JzZW1erY349w1o9v3V0
 lBzd00eJEB3f3wqxG6XHVeHwwMDz05p5duXMPyKpHID3pLyXMkTl8aceSMiVCy1HRQWT
 9T1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCdHKNAzU5tx5FRGm4K0OM4HLz41HAndFOmXo6fub4BvDKRPzKA
 136SCC6uFyrXAd4l
X-Received: by 10.223.169.34 with SMTP id u31mr1592874wrc.46.1494367839783;
 Tue, 09 May 2017 15:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g137sm2458868wme.27.2017.05.09.15.10.38
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 09 May 2017 15:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 00:10:33 +0200
From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com, hhaim@cisco.com
Message-ID: <20170509221033.GQ16218@6wind.com>
References: <20170506012018.18579-1-yskoh@mellanox.com>
 <cover.1494362396.git.yskoh@mellanox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1494362396.git.yskoh@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] net/mlx5: fix erroneous index
	handling for Tx ring
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 22:10:40 -0000

On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:49:29PM -0700, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> This patchset is to fix a critical bug which can occur in case of resource
> deficiency on Tx path. Flowing multi-segment packets can accelerate the
> occurrence rate.
> 
> v2:
> * Split the patch into two separate ones to make back-port easier.
> * Added "Fiexes:" tag and "CC: stable@dpdk.org" for the bug fix.
> 
> Yongseok Koh (2):
>   net/mlx5: fix erroneous index handling for Tx ring
>   net/mlx5: change error-prone code on Tx path
> 
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

For the series:

Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>

Thanks for extracting the fix into a separate patch.

Ferruh, Thomas, is there still time to include this for 17.05 given the
seriousness of this bug?

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND