From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDEE1C00 for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 17:48:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m123so3930086wma.0 for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=v5OpBNBWnBvSK2wToB3vT/YXyVOKV4ZpQSa2J5L8zco=; b=hdkcxGb1CPpVkCgSRbjebuKFbEp8ke7bL/eJpg31YznYSCaR6npvq/u7MeawEh+YXu lFQI9MRqCMmIX/CmL77rAZLOnRTFHDtKbFwmZl8aEKrp7EwREjbJ4JoR6kl4JSdI6AM8 FfNDbCMhLb2AgBQkLO/eU58CzBhYoLB9dtGWMDlzmDlFH0It5qADy7RwML5+2gBy9l9n SSPemK3A2S1HhBauxbUrnUOEb+M1WaPBTqjKyW0uH57Jp0LA7/WoQTINE4UFdNYGd4N7 sIwFKQojFMWkHFJwLpZX4tBmO+UwD+uZ3kslED31hwg1XSc46NvDeJXyRzt1SqO1OHDD EWeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=v5OpBNBWnBvSK2wToB3vT/YXyVOKV4ZpQSa2J5L8zco=; b=Q3bv08P/SUpEIHpKTnG4TjVwMgf5nFfVlKIf+83ItYSnOIcNGptWAaucsN3ZknTxed PKLiLcfi+7Ejjej1blJtwIjR/cMjYcdUlH4lO2nKPc2NWCVmmmT/NsqoiuJSPrzHdepd Mo62mv5aTU4phEuPpos39hNABlcE2uwMK/Ypo/mGtaydMymUqrZPbNo19zszLClz1mOP YrAsR+BRSXcUh+jMCJdKdPBOOVrQv3Qq8TXNjygOrZCaY2fkLTGAOmURaXhuy+a+uMke mUxQKeciiwrS3clKWwTqRYQRDs5MMs9DLSWim7ZJnKvJSlEmDaYbNfwKvVuTAteq7ZJA nCHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBojQRF0gQOaeTKphFTVFGdQeZ5WYx1DSNhsSzyZ5oioiyYZNEH 1nzn+OXJ3Yzzm9H7dQw= X-Received: by 10.28.15.14 with SMTP id 14mr4117345wmp.106.1494431288134; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bidouze.vm.6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g25sm4147625wra.1.2017.05.10.08.48.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 May 2017 08:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 17:48:01 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ga=EBtan?= Rivet To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jan Blunck Message-ID: <20170510154801.GE14914@bidouze.vm.6wind.com> References: <4b1edeb12ff61bdb04a0189be30395589c713dbb.1494420483.git.gaetan.rivet@6wind.com> <18235008.tfIFGzLugk@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <18235008.tfIFGzLugk@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] pci: deprecate PCI detach X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 15:48:09 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 03:02:51PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >10/05/2017 14:52, Gaetan Rivet: >> This patch deprecates the function rte_eal_pci_detach in 17.05, >> which will be removed in 17.08. >> >> The generic detach bus method should be used instead. > >Can we wait to have a new generic detach method for deprecating this one? After discussing it with Thomas, this patch has been dropped from this series. The changes regarding rte_pci_* functions have been postponed to further DPDK releases and will be discussed later. -- Gaëtan Rivet 6WIND