DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Stojaczyk, DariuszX" <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Verkamp, Daniel" <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] vhost: access VhostUsrMsg via packed struct
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 13:58:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170526055840.GB2276@yliu-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FBE7E039FA50BF47A673AD0BD3CD56A8A75106@HASMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:12:07PM +0000, Stojaczyk, DariuszX wrote:
> > This is for fixing compile warnings with new clang 4.0?
> > 
> >     http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-April/064089.html
> > 
> > If so, please show the exact warning in the commit log.
> > 
> 
> Everything compiles, but is undefined behavior.

Would you be a bit more informative about the "undefined behavior"? This
patch set (including this one) looks good to me. I just want the commit
log be more informative. Something like "Fixes unaligned access to fields"
is a bit too vague.

Thanks.

	--yliu

>  Accessing packed struct's fields through pointers would have to be done as following:
> e.g vhost_user_set_vring_addr(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_vring_addr *addr __attribute__((aligned(1)))
> Since the code above is unacceptable, this patch makes all functions take pointer to the parent struct (VhostUserMsg)
> 
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Fixed checkpatch warnings
> > 
> > It's likely it will be easily missed while review. We normally do that:
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > v3: fix checkpatch warnings
> > 
> > v2: remove gerrit id
> > 
> > 	--yliu
> 
> Thanks, I'll stick with it from now on

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-26  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-11 10:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] vhost: fix malloc in rte_vhost_get_mem_table Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-11 10:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] vhost: free virtio_net::guest_pages in vhost_backend_cleanup() Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-11 10:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] vhost: access VhostUsrMsg via packed struct Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-11 10:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] vhost: fix malloc in rte_vhost_get_mem_table Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-11 10:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] vhost: free virtio_net::guest_pages in vhost_backend_cleanup() Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-11 10:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] vhost: access VhostUsrMsg via packed struct Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-11 11:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] vhost: fix malloc in rte_vhost_get_mem_table Jens Freimann
2017-05-11 12:32     ` Stojaczyk, DariuszX
2017-05-11 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] vhost undefined behavior fixes Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-11 14:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] vhost: fix malloc in rte_vhost_get_mem_table() Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-11 13:56       ` Jens Freimann
2017-05-11 14:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] vhost: free guest_pages in vhost_backend_cleanup() Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-11 14:31       ` Jens Freimann
2017-05-11 14:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] vhost: access VhostUsrMsg via packed struct Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-22  7:01       ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-05-24 13:12         ` Stojaczyk, DariuszX
2017-05-26  5:58           ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2017-05-26 11:59     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] vhost: undefined behavior fixes Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-26  8:40       ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-05-26 11:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] vhost: fix malloc in rte_vhost_get_mem_table() Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-26 11:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] vhost: free guest_pages in vhost_backend_cleanup() Dariusz Stojaczyk
2017-05-26 11:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost: access VhostUsrMsg via packed struct Dariusz Stojaczyk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170526055840.GB2276@yliu-dev \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.verkamp@intel.com \
    --cc=dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).