From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f182.google.com (mail-pf0-f182.google.com [209.85.192.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85F27D02 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 22:38:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f182.google.com with SMTP id e193so56814143pfh.0 for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 13:38:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ADecPiAOPwnBSomWjm91UhAelwIaqAkgeC9Bn+LCuJA=; b=MpVdHJ2K5fFwE6dhXbwXFLMtzqBp5wCGVj0ATp6SSU02aZM3on5H2HE7TrR34WDMzN kzQ13ahMTCEkT9HHZLB2+KKG9d6MA/fPPDPV5ozLG9sMpy71bRXsODRePhyfvDElZ8Zb X22J1D6JVmiQhNS7eI4CMz8+SayOFVNtyg+IpT6+BXqxsDLlQL4L4E/GxkTMf5ror16i yduz/frGcdEKmjA40y0CYb3mChbzQxJoXXLFlTpphXNx+8EnQOPnvZq1QKneAjv4IjV5 +wvRe2Fz1gBT+ahe0d//3Kvc6kNya7R+UJlrw2zmKK+kFV3PMHeVbMalJ8E9oWemAPwj R/EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ADecPiAOPwnBSomWjm91UhAelwIaqAkgeC9Bn+LCuJA=; b=lJrNSY3E61C5J4ZMQEWmlVkl2Sk4438N7/4VnMNfmlAPmI0cAQ18nffoL1tdJZWBZy qbIGvO+XWkJdg2rZteXoJIuwd1CnG7qb16B8LAYzvHJfNEGWevdZxQoynjukJuZeBSWX Xt8iGxl7+TnC1z1h3RKKpw9dhijoeH3sTfOWcLJMidV7MnZtb3wQYN26PpXcTEQr/RFs NTUW3WTEq18Gvrto7oN7xxGujjLFWtblVz0lRY/4XluxiiAl1pkN5Kfet3AwgQyNgCP0 tm5qLTsY6kNX9hvuPTmx/MNf9Rgj9SvoqISbPqzsJyx8V2JIRrlHp8O8xPx/9PKmBA7m grvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAWFPUXfisw/nIksIV05K7EQroskHcQFZcGzhUO5u2lp/zo4GLa Bpf9x3aA/CfpnQrh X-Received: by 10.99.111.201 with SMTP id k192mr8809328pgc.192.1496435885535; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 13:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (76-14-207-240.or.wavecable.com. [76.14.207.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s68sm44765956pfj.5.2017.06.02.13.38.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 Jun 2017 13:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:37:58 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "Bie, Tiwei" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Message-ID: <20170602133758.27f5b8a1@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891267BA643D3@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20170601050730.GA5765@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> <136058706.0Fjdze3SFe@xps> <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891267BA643D3@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] proposal of allowing personal/project repos on DPDK.org X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:38:07 -0000 On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:37:40 +0000 "Dumitrescu, Cristian" wrote: > > Why? Do you need to host a repo on dpdk.org to try a new idea? > > > > Prototyping new DPDK-related ideas and sharing them with DPDK community, with some of them likely to eventually make their way into DPDK once accepted and mature enough. > > > > I am against adding some user repos in this list: > > http://dpdk.org/browse/ > > I think the list of official repos must be kept light for good visibility. > > We could have a single project called sandbox mentioned in this list; whoever interested, needs to drill down into this one? > > > > > But we can imagine a forge for users at a different location like > > http://dpdk.org/users/ > > However why not using another public forge for this need? > > Easier to share DPDK related ideas on dpdk.org rather than other places. > Let's not distract Thomas and others with lots of effort to run servers. Having dpdk.org be the server for development and stable should be more than enough. Running a secure server for user repositories is hard. If you want an example, look follow some of the two factor auth stuff being done at kernel.org. Another option would be to have an official clone of dpdk.org on github and let users do what they need to there. This keeps project out of the forge business.