From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
harry.van.haaren@intel.com, gage.eads@intel.com,
nipun.gupta@nxp.com, narender.vangati@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eventdev: define the default value for dequeue timeout
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:08:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170602143830.GA17430@jerin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac781339-7e89-937b-ddb0-233c5e9aa622@nxp.com>
-----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 19:45:44 +0530
> From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, dev@dpdk.org
> CC: bruce.richardson@intel.com, harry.van.haaren@intel.com,
> gage.eads@intel.com, nipun.gupta@nxp.com, narender.vangati@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventdev: define the default value for dequeue timeout
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
> Thunderbird/45.8.0
>
> On 5/18/2017 2:18 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > Defining the value 0 as default value for dequeue timeout
> > will help the application reduce the configuration setup
> > if the application is interested only in default
> > timeout value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > ---
> > This patch will fix following error found in the event_pipeline RFC application
> > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/23799/ with event_octeontx HW driver.
> >
> > EVENTDEV: rte_event_dev_configure() line 379: dev0 invalid
> > dequeue_timeout_ns=0 min_dequeue_timeout_ns=853 max_dequeue_timeout_ns=873813
> > ---
> > drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_evdev.c | 2 ++
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c | 5 +++--
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_evdev.c b/drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_evdev.c
> > index c80a44379..5499b1bf7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_evdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_evdev.c
> > @@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ ssovf_configure(const struct rte_eventdev *dev)
> >
> > ssovf_func_trace();
> > deq_tmo_ns = conf->dequeue_timeout_ns;
> > + if (deq_tmo_ns == 0)
> > + deq_tmo_ns = edev->min_deq_timeout_ns;
>
> '0' should mean don't wait?
Yes. I think, we can leave that to the driver for the minimum supported
dequeue timeout for the given platform(PMD). OCTEONTX PMD needs
different treatment for "no-wait" case, hence setting the minimum value
that PMD supports.
Any other comments on API change?
>
> >
> > if (conf->event_dev_cfg & RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_TIMEOUT) {
> > edev->is_timeout_deq = 1;
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c
> > index 20afc3f0e..8cafffe03 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c
> > @@ -369,9 +369,10 @@ rte_event_dev_configure(uint8_t dev_id,
> >
> > /* Check dequeue_timeout_ns value is in limit */
> > if (!(dev_conf->event_dev_cfg & RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_TIMEOUT)) {
> > - if (dev_conf->dequeue_timeout_ns < info.min_dequeue_timeout_ns
> > + if (dev_conf->dequeue_timeout_ns &&
> > + (dev_conf->dequeue_timeout_ns < info.min_dequeue_timeout_ns
> > || dev_conf->dequeue_timeout_ns >
> > - info.max_dequeue_timeout_ns) {
> > + info.max_dequeue_timeout_ns)) {
> > RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("dev%d invalid dequeue_timeout_ns=%d"
> > " min_dequeue_timeout_ns=%d max_dequeue_timeout_ns=%d",
> > dev_id, dev_conf->dequeue_timeout_ns,
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > index 94284337d..f39fbc6b9 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > @@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ struct rte_event_dev_config {
> > * This value should be in the range of *min_dequeue_timeout_ns* and
> > * *max_dequeue_timeout_ns* which previously provided in
> > * rte_event_dev_info_get()
> > + * The value 0 is allowed, in which case, default dequeue timeout used.
> > * @see RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_TIMEOUT
> > */
> > int32_t nb_events_limit;
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-02 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-18 8:48 Jerin Jacob
2017-05-18 14:15 ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-06-02 14:38 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2017-06-20 15:48 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-21 11:38 ` Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170602143830.GA17430@jerin \
--to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=narender.vangati@intel.com \
--cc=nipun.gupta@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).