From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, matvejchikov@gmail.com, jblunck@infradead.org,
sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: don't advertise a physical address when no hugepages
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 15:58:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170612135857.GB1758@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170609082937.21294-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:29:37AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> When populating a mempool with a virtual memory area, the mempool
> library expects to be able to get the physical address of each page.
>
> When started with --no-huge, the physical addresses may not be available
> because the pages are not locked in memory. It sometimes returns
> RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR, which makes the mempool_populate() function to fail.
>
> This was working before the commit cdc242f260e7 ("eal/linux: support
> running as unprivileged user"), because rte_mem_virt2phy() was returning
> 0 instead of RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR, which was seen as a valid physical
> address.
>
> Since --no-huge is a debug function that breaks the support of physical
> drivers, always set physical addresses to RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR in memzones
> or in rte_mem_virt2phy(), and ensure that mempool won't complain in that
> case.
>
> Fixes: cdc242f260e7 ("eal/linux: support running as unprivileged user")
>
> CC: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Tested-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-12 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-14 10:34 [dpdk-dev] A (possible) problem with `--no-huge` option Ilya Matveychikov
2017-06-09 8:27 ` Olivier Matz
2017-06-09 8:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: don't advertise a physical address when no hugepages Olivier Matz
2017-06-10 8:31 ` Jan Blunck
2017-06-23 8:11 ` Olivier Matz
2017-06-23 17:08 ` Jan Blunck
2017-06-26 7:11 ` santosh
2017-06-12 13:58 ` Adrien Mazarguil [this message]
2017-07-03 10:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2017-07-03 10:17 ` Jan Blunck
2017-07-04 15:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2017-06-09 12:08 ` [dpdk-dev] A (possible) problem with `--no-huge` option Ilya Matveychikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170612135857.GB1758@6wind.com \
--to=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jblunck@infradead.org \
--cc=matvejchikov@gmail.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).