From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com (mail-wr0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340BE7D12 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:28:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 77so3080772wrb.1 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:28:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=1nkkmiJTaD/t4CV2bXgjGgWk+tdHnEP9OW5VHY18KOc=; b=UWQrCDnIlWOSh/yxEh8rxuiw5Pw5oyJowIEisVnKkaiV2Ugw5BUsjajn3Kyl6EDqHZ etzuy0MaS+wQTX7iO7U/SbHemwOAJU43Hf3jfxnroyR3YzY2zj57/6Y6S8CFBjk5JquR GALYthOf7JN6ONySMzdC++8P0r/L8o/x9WNtmPcbeWp7k9pnawbSUwZNXCowM28qd2fG 0XNV338YXzlNi6BXljO7Uzt9usYV2SIDd1leohxeVRhs9yybKqt7pPEJfv8GXPRkE461 Ui/co+6yKgSrDrpkFo1mv1tF0v1EcTmbBt7xVBGalr4DEnyopXB9YoOt0UyhtrxWd00G l8BQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=1nkkmiJTaD/t4CV2bXgjGgWk+tdHnEP9OW5VHY18KOc=; b=uYmIvB+plTVdd5TeXz7SmBGac74rP1BOy0Ai4K/iA2eQ5AUB0JpaRysshuv0VQNbpb ML8wK9DDzgCkFlviSp5WlaRY6K1hnP0q35JsDIvCKatRwFr4tGzTCx8lJiISFZP00ojO xf6HDpesUT9Mq4UNDE/maJjLWL1ux3GUnQghU/ZA5u2gxcID7LeT2Ah/WFs98qZYzVWx eXp8LVPW+fygsreRTOVkyo/gcB4oR/1mlip8ZqcH2TBB8kfZ+YyvFntZOnaEeFjhTJYa gRGvXIyh1gSw75iCILUdODb/LUKT4tss7c0UMiEMvdfrztTOmNbROLexVREzcGGkVjlt yADw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzUb5rOr6BcRHIocsd2OZJ52d2VcjL8ouo3bNcDliQomQT2rZTu W+wGqB+oxMAmy7ChjatFiA== X-Received: by 10.28.7.1 with SMTP id 1mr212064wmh.22.1497450490645; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from autoinstall.dev.6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 97sm196947wrc.5.2017.06.14.07.28.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:28:02 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=E9lio?= Laranjeiro To: Adrien Mazarguil Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170614142802.GR18438@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Fix Rx interrupt support in mlx4 and mlx5 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:28:11 -0000 On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 01:49:10PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: > Several issues mainly related to error handling were found in both > implementations as they share most of their Rx interrupts handling code. > > Another problem with the mlx4 implementation is that it does not work > properly with multiple ports adapters that share a common PCI device. > > Adrien Mazarguil (7): > net/mlx4: fix typos from prior commit > net/mlx4: fix Rx interrupts with multiple ports > net/mlx4: fix Rx interrupts management > net/mlx5: fix misplaced Rx interrupts functions > net/mlx5: fix Rx interrupts support checks > net/mlx5: fix return value in Rx interrupts code > net/mlx5: fix Rx interrupts management > > drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++------------------- > drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.h | 1 + > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c | 2 + > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 73 -------------- > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h | 12 +-- > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c | 16 ++-- > 7 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 231 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.1.4 For the series: Acked-by: Nelio Laranjeiro -- Nélio Laranjeiro 6WIND