From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2958B9E3;
 Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:15:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2017 23:15:01 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,364,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="869772921"
Received: from debian-zgviawfucg.sh.intel.com (HELO debian-ZGViaWFuCg)
 ([10.239.67.43])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2017 23:15:00 -0700
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:16:19 +0800
From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20170620061618.GA14527@debian-ZGViaWFuCg>
References: <20170601050730.GA5765@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> <11265330.F2tAlQhP2k@xps>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <11265330.F2tAlQhP2k@xps>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] proposal of allowing personal/project repos on
 DPDK.org
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 06:15:04 -0000

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:29:29PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 01/06/2017 07:07, Tiwei Bie:
> > We'd like to make a proposal of making DPDK.org allow hosting
> > some personal/project repos, which could be very useful when
> > someone wants to try some experimental projects in DPDK.
> 
> It has been discussed during the last technical board meeting.
> The board was not convinced by this idea, but would like to better
> understand what is the problem to be solved with this proposal?
> 
> If there is something to solve, we could decide one these proposals:
> 	1/ let users free to choose their forge
> 	2/ advise for gitlab
> 	3/ advise for github (and fight to recover the name DPDK)
> 	4/ pay a sysadmin to host and secure our own forge in dpdk.org domain
> 

Anyway, I don't think it's a bad idea to get the name DPDK back
on github if possible. Any thoughts?

Best regards,
Tiwei Bie