From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A96374; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:27:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jun 2017 00:27:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,364,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="1142988976" Received: from debian-zgviawfucg.sh.intel.com (HELO debian-ZGViaWFuCg) ([10.239.67.43]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2017 00:27:31 -0700 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:28:49 +0800 From: Tiwei Bie To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170620072848.GA26636@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> References: <20170601050730.GA5765@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> <11265330.F2tAlQhP2k@xps> <20170620061618.GA14527@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> <2183495.DK3t6yERKa@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2183495.DK3t6yERKa@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] proposal of allowing personal/project repos on DPDK.org X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 07:27:48 -0000 On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:21:34AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 20/06/2017 08:16, Tiwei Bie: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:29:29PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > 01/06/2017 07:07, Tiwei Bie: > > > > We'd like to make a proposal of making DPDK.org allow hosting > > > > some personal/project repos, which could be very useful when > > > > someone wants to try some experimental projects in DPDK. > > > > > > It has been discussed during the last technical board meeting. > > > The board was not convinced by this idea, but would like to better > > > understand what is the problem to be solved with this proposal? > > > > > > If there is something to solve, we could decide one these proposals: > > > 1/ let users free to choose their forge > > > 2/ advise for gitlab > > > 3/ advise for github (and fight to recover the name DPDK) > > > 4/ pay a sysadmin to host and secure our own forge in dpdk.org domain > > > > > > > Anyway, I don't think it's a bad idea to get the name DPDK back > > on github if possible. Any thoughts? > > I've already tried to get it two years ago. > I will try again requesting help from the Linux Foundation. Cool! Glad to hear that! Thank you! :-) Best regards, Tiwei Bie