From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E2C377E; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:48:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2017 06:48:30 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,281,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="986694811" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.28]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2017 06:48:28 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:48:27 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:48:27 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: techboard@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170629134827.GA16748@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <4894592.KiajU2lGAy@xps> <20170629125938.GA11928@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <2018976.Gf4KLAyyyC@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2018976.Gf4KLAyyyC@xps> Organization: Intel Research and =?iso-8859-1?Q?De=ACvel?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?opment?= Ireland Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.1 (2017-04-11) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] release manager backup X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:48:32 -0000 On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 03:28:41PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 29/06/2017 14:59, Bruce Richardson: > > Yes, I think this is a good idea. [What with all the buses working with > > DPDK now, I think we need a good plan in case you get hit by one. :-P ] > > You overestimates how strong are those buses! > > Are you applying for a role as risk manager? :) :-)