From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C4E9957 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:43:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m85so19639442wma.0 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 04:43:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TqX3eTP2vq24dX0xdh171rqDPopyWeAJGsXE2DvKnpg=; b=CKc66eamS3yjqLZFwdd7om+cfRQjCL3+5ySIKh5dWLfVsF5813P4BWOchA902DZAnX CW2FDQNEfAbBX4/9PAVK5wJhqXlJI2jZDIAm9P2drnaO4YOVQnwxQuW3kwbfRLLEDCTh w7+MU+DCuM3z/4oTOn3g6QTfv8WfERFXfJnWJXFYfyve2acQ42ACgNG9mGLsW/INxkQ7 d7suIallhIZVrvo+kdeJjzUGVmEhUt1HHPwVfgkYt7EBsAkQfvSVz87na05m0ij9Yt2w 9YiOxjM5pOKCgxsEGiMbmCoJLoc3lYg525zUa4h5mF0YdEAOyA/mIjqtP2XereVCfzXH n5vw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TqX3eTP2vq24dX0xdh171rqDPopyWeAJGsXE2DvKnpg=; b=WFoHDLituLJebf5OMj5EEPcPsfFvv7bN5BxdW86tW7DKcKDtwSK9L8ZNhOfwd+6zqa g89yW3Hd/xBMa9RjGBDpHXFM6SiFlSZsCgqoDns57HYm0dUlFNY3VB69fM3lYN+hUhNU r5NIrcPkcmbjmvPNoREcxNksSHcWFDkbe9lqgs+g+A6G6c4sqjg/LQJV9xS9GiWBwARY 5TyAZr4E0FNuN3/2K9+TTX8UBKOYNZKtR77UN5MAupJEvwrKnzGNmzhuFHklROSEGW1Y eZYGFMnPUVM4nsBDk7OzuOwf5onHqkU6bTioNTGczLR1VLaOKP8mmWPCKt3iXdAl1j2K lTjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112KDwUepG1/dEbdPvV3bfomfB+/Ji/sKKeNTm0FoRnZ4xWV7yZx MHOv/5m3lwwEwvPE X-Received: by 10.28.10.131 with SMTP id 125mr5659105wmk.132.1501242204558; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 04:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neon (AAmiens-551-1-34-208.w109-219.abo.wanadoo.fr. [109.219.1.208]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u66sm30029811wrb.77.2017.07.28.04.43.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 04:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:43:22 +0200 From: Olivier MATZ To: Beilei Xing Cc: jingjing.wu@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170728134322.364d73b2@neon> In-Reply-To: <1499156776-15091-1-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com> References: <1499156776-15091-1-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: add VLAN stripping support for VF X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:43:25 -0000 Hi Beilei, On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:26:16 +0800 Beilei Xing wrote: > VLAN stripping configuration is supported only for DPDK PF > previously. Since kernel PF supports VLAN stripping now, this > patch adds VLAN stripping support for both DPDK PF and kernel > PF. > If I understand correctly, enabling/disabling vlan stripping should now work with a kernel PF, is that correct? Which version of the driver should we use? I don't see any definition for VIRTCHNL_OP_ENABLE_VLAN_STRIPPING in the latest kernel or in the sourceforge driver. Thanks, Olivier