From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com (mail-wr0-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5E89179 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:11:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 12so4801691wrb.1 for ; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 03:11:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4pYH9ACpCot3hoU8xfZrXRmU0bkrrdxcQfN95loy9nQ=; b=ewM11EO+s0KBnvDfJtkGdp/X/pbyRspcklZYJXBZjGSKWVFUwSOaH4srB6kDbcIS/E c4Q+H3qbh6+SKCAF7mLjQsw/MNJBkhgPz1zs0rMwnDMmhi1eEG88s/Zf1LOGBx9HjKDy I6CN0vVv8ff/3MJy98lzca61eyv0/Wfa+k//KUlkOx+90z8Ecke7FlffhJZ4rx4Nq8E1 7xPU1RS5UDQuAJzIC0DtjQGOaXG0uDMB+dAJp6U6Lz8RRRisInvn/QQNIjDON7p46mhc wYRf7CKlQOZUyp8mdG1IHhJAd6r86IBRBPIhXuTexevXZTpH3oSTOAlRQqiQT/4xQB38 vzfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4pYH9ACpCot3hoU8xfZrXRmU0bkrrdxcQfN95loy9nQ=; b=bmDKJp30Z4Veb/SVRkDi/2D9iHtER4qFS4YiHAK0wsRsvPIaFaaKgeDzcSKGSPeaDs +KLxzANOydEAObZ8X6mIKqgGGhI+Mx9ibxnem2sqYmGPkf7tMW4hqR1prONK2Jeq1jdE 3tQALk2QDZxWRvqIFLSJpsbvGOhi6fYxHXlZflsDforGUejj+HtvIEWSp1SPhcqlYkMl HWvNTGeqkOAQlbpRtVZjyu5eYHJLsJPRuQdM6j9zmnXYxj7pcec87dKhWdtxox/E6LWC YrZIqX0imxuECdsWkgTaGdxFL8fp2SNSluxbKkeVRogZkcFt6pDyHmimN/qPcOwRwCxh XY4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112o0PDnmSYhjXLfNgPYckTbep1Pm+jclcQ0iz0LgMQ1qDm+o8UI 8rM1xJAqeTkAJiu0 X-Received: by 10.223.131.67 with SMTP id 61mr14034940wrd.54.1501582285887; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 03:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u49sm29474482wrc.14.2017.08.01.03.11.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Aug 2017 03:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:11:16 +0200 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: Nelio Laranjeiro Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Yongseok Koh , stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170801101116.GS19852@6wind.com> References: <1501574157-1676-1-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1501574157-1676-1-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix MTU update X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:11:26 -0000 On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:55:57AM +0200, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote: > Changing the MTU is not related to changing the number of segments, > activating or not the multi-segment support should be handled by the > application. > > Fixes: 9964b965ad69 ("net/mlx5: re-add Rx scatter support") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro > Acked-by: Yongseok Koh Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil Shouldn't this fix target an even older commit? cf37ca9563d5 ("mlx5: support MTU configuration") -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND