[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] next techboard meeting (29th, August)

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] next techboard meeting (29th, August)

[Jerin Jacob]

Hi All,

The next meeting of the tech board will happen on IRC #dpdk-board, at 3pm UTC, on 29th of August(Tuesday)

Agenda:

1) Discussion on next tree requests
a) Next tree for IPSec offload and maintainership
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/072995.html
b) Next tree for cli
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/073343.html

2) Approval of a policy for changes to the minimum DPDK requirements.
e.g. like what was done with bumping IA min to SSE4.2 in last release.

3) Discussion on New RFC:
a) ethdev new offload API
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/072643.html
b) IPSec offload(rte_security)
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/072900.html
c) event timer wheel
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/072980.html

Online version of agenda:
https://annuel.framapad.org/p/dpdk-techboard-aug-29

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] next techboard meeting (29th, August)

[Bruce Richardson]

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 06:54:35PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> The next meeting of the tech board will happen on IRC #dpdk-board, at 3pm UTC, on 29th of August(Tuesday)
> 
> Agenda:
> 
> 1) Discussion on next tree requests
> a) Next tree for IPSec offload and maintainership
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/072995.html
> b) Next tree for cli
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/073343.html
> 
> 2) Approval of a policy for changes to the minimum DPDK requirements.
> e.g. like what was done with bumping IA min to SSE4.2 in last release.
> 

Proposal for a policy for this item, so as to hopefully speed up the
discussion at the meeting:

* Updates to the minimum HW requirements, i.e. those dropping support for
  hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI
  change, and follow that deprecation policy. Specifically:
  - change announced at least one release in advance
  - patches removing support for the older hardware should have at least
    three ACKs before being applied.

Regards,
/Bruce

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] next techboard meeting (29th, August)

[Jerin Jacob]

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:04:10 +0100
> From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> CC: techboard@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-techboard]  next techboard meeting (29th, August)
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
> 
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 06:54:35PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > The next meeting of the tech board will happen on IRC #dpdk-board, at 3pm UTC, on 29th of August(Tuesday)
> > 
> > Agenda:
> > 
> > 1) Discussion on next tree requests
> > a) Next tree for IPSec offload and maintainership
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/072995.html
> > b) Next tree for cli
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/073343.html
> > 
> > 2) Approval of a policy for changes to the minimum DPDK requirements.
> > e.g. like what was done with bumping IA min to SSE4.2 in last release.
> > 
> 
> Proposal for a policy for this item, so as to hopefully speed up the
> discussion at the meeting:
> 
> * Updates to the minimum HW requirements, i.e. those dropping support for
>   hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI
>   change, and follow that deprecation policy. Specifically:
>   - change announced at least one release in advance
>   - patches removing support for the older hardware should have at least
>     three ACKs before being applied.


The meeting got canceled due to lack of quorum. Scheduled Again for
tomorrow at the same time.

/Jerin