DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/9] net/virtio: rationalize setting of Rx/Tx handlers
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 17:19:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170901091916.GT9736@yliu-home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170831134015.1383-8-olivier.matz@6wind.com>

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 03:40:13PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> The selection of Rx/Tx handlers is done at several places,
> group them in one function set_rxtx_funcs().
> 
> The update of hw->use_simple_rxtx is also rationalized:
> - initialized to 1 (prefer simple path)
> - in dev configure or rx/tx queue setup, if something prevents from
>   using the simple path, change it to 0.
> - in dev start, set the handlers according to hw->use_simple_rxtx.
> 
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org

This patch looks like a refactoring to me, that I don't think it's really
a good idea to back port it to a stable release.

...
> @@ -1534,7 +1554,6 @@ eth_virtio_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>  	RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM < sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf));
>  
>  	eth_dev->dev_ops = &virtio_eth_dev_ops;
> -	eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = &virtio_xmit_pkts;
>  
>  	if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY) {
>  		if (!hw->virtio_user_dev) {
> @@ -1544,12 +1563,8 @@ eth_virtio_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>  		}
>  
>  		virtio_set_vtpci_ops(hw);
> -		if (hw->use_simple_rxtx) {
> -			eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = virtio_xmit_pkts_simple;
> -			eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = virtio_recv_pkts_vec;
> -		} else {
> -			rx_func_get(eth_dev);
> -		}
> +		set_rxtx_funcs(eth_dev);

No need to invoke it here?

> +
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1726,6 +1741,18 @@ virtio_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>  			return -EBUSY;
>  		}
>  
> +	hw->use_simple_rxtx = 1;
> +
> +#if defined RTE_ARCH_X86
> +	if (!rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_SSE3))

DPDK now requires SSE4.2. You might want to add another patch to remove
this testing.

> +		hw->use_simple_rxtx = 0;
> +#elif defined RTE_ARCH_ARM64 || defined CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM
> +	if (!rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON))
> +		hw->use_simple_rxtx = 0;
> +#endif
> +	if (vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF))
> +		hw->use_simple_rxtx = 0;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1802,6 +1829,7 @@ virtio_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>  		VIRTQUEUE_DUMP(txvq->vq);
>  	}
>  
> +	set_rxtx_funcs(dev);
>  	hw->started = 1;
>  
>  	/* Initialize Link state */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> index a32e3229f..c9d97b643 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> @@ -505,25 +505,14 @@ static void
>  virtio_update_rxtx_handler(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>  			   const struct rte_eth_txconf *tx_conf)

This function name doesn't quite make sense now after your refactoring.

>  {
> -	uint8_t use_simple_rxtx = 0;
>  	struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private;
> +	uint8_t use_simple_rxtx = hw->use_simple_rxtx;
>  
> -#if defined RTE_ARCH_X86
> -	if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_SSE3))
> -		use_simple_rxtx = 1;
> -#elif defined RTE_ARCH_ARM64 || defined CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM
> -	if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON))
> -		use_simple_rxtx = 1;
> -#endif
> -	/* Use simple rx/tx func if single segment and no offloads */
> -	if (use_simple_rxtx &&
> -	    (tx_conf->txq_flags & VIRTIO_SIMPLE_FLAGS) == VIRTIO_SIMPLE_FLAGS &&
> -	    !vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
> -		PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "Using simple rx/tx path");
> -		dev->tx_pkt_burst = virtio_xmit_pkts_simple;
> -		dev->rx_pkt_burst = virtio_recv_pkts_vec;
> -		hw->use_simple_rxtx = use_simple_rxtx;
> -	}
> +	/* cannot use simple rxtx funcs with multisegs or offloads */
> +	if ((tx_conf->txq_flags & VIRTIO_SIMPLE_FLAGS) != VIRTIO_SIMPLE_FLAGS)
> +		use_simple_rxtx = 0;

And that's what left in this function. How about just un-folding it?

	--yliu

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-01  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-31 13:40 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] virtio fixes Olivier Matz
2017-08-31 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/9] net/virtio: revert "do not claim to support LRO" Olivier Matz
2017-08-31 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/9] net/virtio: revert "do not falsely claim to do IP checksum" Olivier Matz
2017-08-31 13:47   ` Olivier MATZ
2017-08-31 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/9] doc: fix description of L4 Rx checksum offload Olivier Matz
2017-08-31 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] net/virtio: fix log levels in configure Olivier Matz
2017-08-31 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/9] net/virtio: fix mbuf port for simple Rx function Olivier Matz
2017-08-31 13:48   ` Olivier MATZ
2017-08-31 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/9] net/virtio: fix queue setup consistency Olivier Matz
2017-08-31 13:49   ` Olivier MATZ
2017-08-31 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/9] net/virtio: rationalize setting of Rx/Tx handlers Olivier Matz
2017-09-01  9:19   ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2017-09-01  9:52     ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-01 12:31       ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-06 14:40         ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-07  8:13           ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-08-31 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/9] net/virtio: keep Rx handler whatever the Tx queue config Olivier Matz
2017-08-31 13:50   ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-01  9:25   ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-01  9:58     ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-01 12:22       ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-08-31 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 9/9] net/virtio: fix Rx handler when checksum is requested Olivier Matz
2017-08-31 13:51   ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-07 12:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/10] virtio fixes Olivier Matz
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/10] net/virtio: revert "do not claim to support LRO" Olivier Matz
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/10] net/virtio: revert "do not falsely claim to do IP checksum" Olivier Matz
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/10] doc: fix description of L4 Rx checksum offload Olivier Matz
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/10] net/virtio: fix log levels in configure Olivier Matz
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/10] net/virtio: fix mbuf port for simple Rx function Olivier Matz
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/10] net/virtio: fix queue setup consistency Olivier Matz
2017-12-06  5:25     ` Tiwei Bie
2017-12-07 14:14       ` Olivier MATZ
2017-12-08  2:17         ` Tiwei Bie
2018-02-01  3:14     ` Yao, Lei A
2018-02-01  8:27       ` Olivier Matz
2018-02-07  8:31         ` Xu, Qian Q
2018-02-07 22:01           ` Olivier Matz
2018-02-09  5:44             ` Wang, Zhihong
2018-02-09  8:59               ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-09  9:40                 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/10] net/virtio: rationalize setting of Rx/Tx handlers Olivier Matz
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/10] net/virtio: remove SSE check Olivier Matz
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/10] net/virtio: keep Rx handler whatever the Tx queue config Olivier Matz
2017-09-07 12:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/10] net/virtio: fix Rx handler when checksum is requested Olivier Matz
2017-09-12  2:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/10] virtio fixes Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170901091916.GT9736@yliu-home \
    --to=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).